The UN peacekeeping operations now underway in Lebanon offer a big opportunity for the organization to demonstrate its relevance and impact on the world stage.
If only those member states who claim to be the UN's biggest supporters would put their money where their mouths are.
Many world leaders, particularly those in Europe, decry the administration of US President George W. Bush's undermining of the UN, especially since 2003.
Yet leaders in France, who expressed outrage when the US sidestepped the UN and invaded Iraq without the international community's blessing, stunned the world last month when they backed down from their promise to send 2,000 peacekeepers to intervene in southern Lebanon, and instead only committed 200.
Fortunately, France is reconsidering, Germany will provide limited naval assistance, and Italy has stepped up to contribute 3,000 peacekeepers.
But Europe's response, like the US response in other cases, highlights a critical issue for all supporters of the UN and other international institutions -- if we cannot do what it takes to make them more effective, we will increasingly find that nations will bypass them altogether.
UN Security Council Resolution 1701 "calls for Israel and Lebanon to support a permanent ceasefire."
It thus set the stage for UN officials to draw up "Rules of Engagement" (ROEs) for peacekeepers that dictate when and under what circumstances UN troops can fire their weapons to defend themselves. But as the current UN mission in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has learned, defending yourself is not the same as protecting yourself from hostile fire in the first place.
In this context, the French are understandably worried about the fate of their soldiers -- soldiers charged with supporting the Lebanese government in its efforts to establish control over the Hezbollah-controlled south. The terrible French peacekeeping experience in Bosnia in the early 1990s, in which France lost 84 soldiers serving in a humanitarian capacity under a restrictive ROE, justifies their fears.
But ROEs are only the symptom of a deeper problem. The real issue is a yawning gap between paper and practice. In the heat of an international crisis, the Security Council passes resolutions to great public fanfare, establishing an official UN "mandate."
But the UN secretary-general is left, resolution in hand, to ask UN member states for the actual, tangible resources necessary to implement what has been resolved upon. In the overwhelming majority of cases, those resources fall far short of what is required to successfully intervene in a crisis.
A UN mandate review this year found that UN member states adopt hundreds of mandates each year, conferring "additional responsibilities with neither corresponding funds nor guidance" on how resources should be used.
In US domestic politics, these kinds of demands made by the US Congress upon states are known as "unfunded mandates," which order results without providing the resources necessary to achieve them. It's political theater -- big headlines, small results.
The UN's experience in Lebanon is not encouraging. According to the organization's Department of Peacekeeping Operations, UNIFIL has operated on an annual budget of US$94 million and suffers chronic budget shortfalls due to unpaid assessments from member states.
Now consider what UNIFIL has been mandated to do under Resolution 1701: peacekeepers must monitor the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, support and accompany the Lebanese armed forces as they deploy in southern Lebanon, assist Lebanon's government in securing the country's borders and ports to keep illegal weapons from getting into Hezbollah's hands and "help ensure humanitarian access to civilian populations and the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons."
This is a Herculean task. But a month after the resolution, not even 5,000 troops have been deployed.
Even if all 15,000 UN troops could be found and deployed, the challenges in Lebanon will remain daunting. The UN insists that Resolution 1701 does not mandate that the UN disarm Hezbollah; almost no nation other than Israel is willing to charge its soldiers with that task. Instead, that job falls to the Lebanese government and armed forces, who need all the help they can get from the international community.
That is only the military aspect of the peacekeeping effort. Lebanon's infrastructure -- especially in the south -- has been decimated. Homes and livelihoods have been destroyed. Who will build or re-build hospitals? How will communications infrastructure be rebuilt? Who will repair Lebanon's bridges and roads?
The mandate gap reflects the way the world has done business with the UN for decades -- big promises, small pay-outs and then playing a blame game if the UN fails.
But today the international community has a tremendous window of opportunity to secure a small but significant peace in the Middle East along the volatile border of Lebanon and Israel. How member states respond now -- especially those who believe in the purpose and value of the UN -- may help shape the outcomes of other, wider ongoing regional conflicts, notably with Iran and Syria, both of which support Hezbollah.
The UN provides the mechanism for a global response, but as UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan often repeats, it does not exist apart from its member states. It is up to those members to provide both the necessary will and the required resources.
Otherwise the UN is nothing more than a handy mechanism for outsourcing political blame. Our commitment to bring peace to the Middle East -- or Darfur, Congo, Kosovo or Haiti -- is not measured by our words, but by our wallets. The world gets what it pays for.
Anne-Marie Slaughter is dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs