As the general assembly of the UN opens this week, it has its best opportunity in years to make a life-saving difference to people all over the world. An opportunity to stop human rights abuses, limit the threat of terrorism and reduce suffering for millions. The opportunity is a draft resolution for an international arms trade treaty that would place tough controls on sales.
The treaty would make it illegal to sell weapons to human rights abusers, make it harder for weapons to end up in the hands of criminals and terrorists and help regulate a trade that is spiralling out of control with US$900 billion annually spent on defense versus only US$60 billion on aid. Every day over 1,000 people lose their lives through armed violence.
We have seen the appalling consequences recently in the Middle East. The Israeli army flattened civilian targets with precision-guided, 500kg "bunker-buster" bombs, forcing almost a million people to flee their homes. Hezbollah fired rockets into civilian areas in northern Israel, killing residents and forcing others to leave. Both actions were war crimes largely perpetrated with weapons imported from other countries.
Israel's military hardware, including its deadly cluster bombs, is overwhelmingly made in the US. And hi-tech British components were used in the Apache helicopters that have fired rockets at cars on crowded streets and in the F-16s that devastated southern Lebanon. For its part, Hezbollah doesn't manufacture the Katyushas or Khaibar-1 missiles it fired indiscriminately into Israel -- it buys them.
Six-year-old Abbas Yusef Shibli picked up a cluster munition while playing with friends because it looked "like a perfume bottle." When it exploded in his hand, he suffered a ruptured colon, a ruptured gall bladder and a perforated lung.
Nicaragua, my birthplace, is still awash with weapons, the legacy of a bloody conflict -- fuelled in part by the US arming the Contras -- in which more than 40,000 civilians were killed. Nicaragua is now one of the poorest nations in the western hemisphere.
For decades, the US provided millions of dollars in military aid to oppressive governments in Latin America and many of those countries now have high levels of armed violence. As a human rights campaigner, I have advocated on behalf of countless victims of conflicts, from Latin America to the Balkans to the Middle East. I can attest to the devastating effect on the civilian population, particularly on women and children.
Despite all this, some nations will try to block the treaty's progress, though their arguments are fundamentally flawed.
The arms trade resolution, jointly put forward by Britain, Finland, Japan Argentina, Australia, Costa Rica and Kenya, would not undermine any state's sovereignty or ability to lawfully defend itself with force. It would not hamper their law enforcement efforts to provide security for citizens.
Arms importers and exporters would simply have a set of rules to abide by, rather than the current mixture of uneven and conflicting regulations.
The treaty would promote real security. It would help to stop armed groups -- that pay no heed to international law -- from equipping themselves.
An Amnesty International report last year detailed shipments of more than 240 tonnes of weapons from eastern Europe to governments in Africa's war-torn Great Lakes region that were passed on to militias involved in massacres, mutilations and mass rapes.
More than 50 countries have voiced support for an arms trade treaty, but to make it happen we need the approval of a majority of the 192 member states. Today Britain hosts a meeting of diplomats to discuss tougher arms controls. For once the international community can act preemptively to prevent carnage, not just mop up afterwards. It is an opportunity that the UN must seize.
Bianca Jagger is goodwill ambassador for the Council of Europe.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this