Pro-China commentators who hold up the economies of Hong Kong and Singapore as examples of why the government should further open up to China have found a new theme in Ireland, Finland and the Netherlands, and their histories of success are constantly plugged in the pro-unification media.
The comparison seems appropriate at first. The three countries are not city-state economies like Hong Kong and Singapore. Those advocating closer cross-strait economic ties argue that since these developed states, whose size and population are similar to those of Taiwan, can succeed, why can't Taiwan succeed too?
Following this logic, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) offered the experiences of the three countries as a theoretical foundation for opening up to China during the recent Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development. But anyone who knows anything about the EU knows that the circumstances of those countries have no parallel in Taiwan.
Why? First, the prerequisite for joining the EU is that a member state must be independent and recognized and respected by all others. However, Taiwan's sovereignty is still disputed by China.
Second, the EU can allow countries big and small to co-exist because bigger countries such as Germany, Italy, France and Spain counterbalance each other so that smaller countries can exert influence. In terms of size, there is a wide discrepancy between Taiwan and China. If they do not stand on an equal footing, bigger countries will only swallow up smaller ones, with the smaller economies either marginalized or becoming satellites of the bigger economy.
Third, Ireland, Finland and the Netherlands have a strong national identity. Their citizens would not easily accept their country being marginalized for the sake of business interests. In Taiwan, the question of national identity remains unresolved, and this is one reason for its rapid marginalization by China.
Fourth, Ireland, Finland and the Netherlands have different languages and religious beliefs, thus permitting a natural distance from one another and insulating them from economic attraction. Taiwan does not have this natural shield to insulate it from China.
Clearly, the experiences of the Netherlands, Ireland and Finland do not apply to Taiwan because of the current state of the cross-strait relationship. It is understandable that pro-China media would promote this concept, but I do not understand why Su is following suit. Perhaps his knowledge of macroeconomics is limited, or perhaps he is being pushed. The latter is more likely.
Taiwan's accumulated China-bound investment -- currently worth US$300 billion -- was 86 percent of the nation's GDP last year, while South Korea's and Japan's China-bound investment accounted for a mere 1.7 percent and 1 percent of GDP respectively.
China's influence over local business interests is growing. Fortunately, the assets of Taiwanese banks are not under Chinese control. If the banks are allowed to move to China, the situation will be unsalvageable.
This is what William Kirby, a professor at Harvard University, meant when he said that Taiwan is already under Beijing's control, and one of the few things that Taiwan is still able to decide is the manner in which it wants to open itself up to China.
Taiwan's dependence on China grows every year, while its growth rate continues to decrease. It seems there is no way to stop the flow of capital and manpower to China. The government seems to be unable to stop the trend, so it is not a question of when or how Taiwan will become dependent on China; the process has started, and the pace is increasing.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president. Translated by Daniel Cheng
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry