Pro-China commentators who hold up the economies of Hong Kong and Singapore as examples of why the government should further open up to China have found a new theme in Ireland, Finland and the Netherlands, and their histories of success are constantly plugged in the pro-unification media.
The comparison seems appropriate at first. The three countries are not city-state economies like Hong Kong and Singapore. Those advocating closer cross-strait economic ties argue that since these developed states, whose size and population are similar to those of Taiwan, can succeed, why can't Taiwan succeed too?
Following this logic, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) offered the experiences of the three countries as a theoretical foundation for opening up to China during the recent Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development. But anyone who knows anything about the EU knows that the circumstances of those countries have no parallel in Taiwan.
Why? First, the prerequisite for joining the EU is that a member state must be independent and recognized and respected by all others. However, Taiwan's sovereignty is still disputed by China.
Second, the EU can allow countries big and small to co-exist because bigger countries such as Germany, Italy, France and Spain counterbalance each other so that smaller countries can exert influence. In terms of size, there is a wide discrepancy between Taiwan and China. If they do not stand on an equal footing, bigger countries will only swallow up smaller ones, with the smaller economies either marginalized or becoming satellites of the bigger economy.
Third, Ireland, Finland and the Netherlands have a strong national identity. Their citizens would not easily accept their country being marginalized for the sake of business interests. In Taiwan, the question of national identity remains unresolved, and this is one reason for its rapid marginalization by China.
Fourth, Ireland, Finland and the Netherlands have different languages and religious beliefs, thus permitting a natural distance from one another and insulating them from economic attraction. Taiwan does not have this natural shield to insulate it from China.
Clearly, the experiences of the Netherlands, Ireland and Finland do not apply to Taiwan because of the current state of the cross-strait relationship. It is understandable that pro-China media would promote this concept, but I do not understand why Su is following suit. Perhaps his knowledge of macroeconomics is limited, or perhaps he is being pushed. The latter is more likely.
Taiwan's accumulated China-bound investment -- currently worth US$300 billion -- was 86 percent of the nation's GDP last year, while South Korea's and Japan's China-bound investment accounted for a mere 1.7 percent and 1 percent of GDP respectively.
China's influence over local business interests is growing. Fortunately, the assets of Taiwanese banks are not under Chinese control. If the banks are allowed to move to China, the situation will be unsalvageable.
This is what William Kirby, a professor at Harvard University, meant when he said that Taiwan is already under Beijing's control, and one of the few things that Taiwan is still able to decide is the manner in which it wants to open itself up to China.
Taiwan's dependence on China grows every year, while its growth rate continues to decrease. It seems there is no way to stop the flow of capital and manpower to China. The government seems to be unable to stop the trend, so it is not a question of when or how Taiwan will become dependent on China; the process has started, and the pace is increasing.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president. Translated by Daniel Cheng
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations