For a while, postcolonial Taiwan was the economic leader among the four "Asian Tigers." Politically, it implemented direct presidential elections and a transfer of power within a few years. Western products and technology can now be found everywhere. Reform in the political, economic and educational spheres, however, has stagnated and even gone backwards.
Consider the nouveau riche. Despite living in mansions, driving expensive cars, carrying Louis Vuitton bags and using cellphones, computers, the Internet and other modern technology, they are involved in traffic accidents, bully employees and deceive customers.
We know upstarts will repeat these mistakes until they stop relying on extravagance and review their flaws. Similarly, if Taiwan -- at the crossroads of reform -- does not review its past and condemn its colonial history, it will not complete its transformation into a modern nation.
If we ask who should take the most responsibility for reform, the answer is not any single political party. Rather, it is academia, especially the intellectuals who direct social thinking. Corruption in society is a reflection of their failure. Intellectuals in power who clutch their halo of Western science and direct policy formulation while ignoring our postcolonial mindset are the main cause of our "self-colonization."
Take education: Although we have adopted Western educational ideologies, test results remain the only standard for measuring academic performance.
In medicine, divination often outweighs professional medical prescriptions.
In economics, blind development of the high-tech industry has turned Taiwan into a satellite factory for US multinational firms, giving the US greater power than even colonial rulers.
Worse, under the expensive World-Class University Plan, intellectuals make every effort to publish articles in journals recognized by the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and the Science Citation Index (SCI), rendering themselves dependent on US academia.
While Taiwan may appear to have adopted many aspects of Western civilization, we continue to follow a traditional value system. In other words, Taiwan is like a freed slave who wants to prove his superiority by his old master's standards. Thus, despite the transfer of power in 2000, the new government is repeating the policies of the old government.
We must initiate a "constructive destruction" -- a comprehensive review of the damage remaining from the colonial past, then the construction of a new value system. During the colonial era, existing simply meant staying alive, while in the 21st century's knowledge-based society, existing means improving life values. Earlier, people were slaves due to greed and fear; now, people strive to self-realize out of interest and passion.
Morality plays an important role in both eras. Morality was used to punish and subdue colonial subjects; now it is a spontaneous force for regulating oneself. These are opposing standards.
Only through a complete assessment of our colonial history can we set new standards and build a new social order. That is also the only way to build a political and educational system supporting a knowledge-based economy.
We believe the impotence and laziness of intellectuals created Taiwan's difficulties. If this elite can muster enough moral courage, sense of historical mission and conscience, we sincerely ask them to apply "pan-historic" moral values as part of a comprehensive review of their activities.
Tseng Kuei-hi is a doctor and former chairman of the Southern Taiwan Society. Bob Kuo is a professor of information systems at National Sun Yat-sen University and former vice chairman of the Southern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this