Following last year's hurricane season, the most active in US history, scientific debate has intensified as US scientists seek to prove or dispute the theory that human-caused global warming and the greenhouse gas effect are unleashing more threatening natural disasters.
Despite their differences over the cause of the intense storms, most observers agree that the migration of people to the coasts and the destruction of natural landscapes by development in coastal cities has created an increasingly lethal situation.
There's also little doubt that warmer water in the Atlantic plays a role. The hotter that body of water and the air over it, the worse and more frequent the storms, which draw upon the heat energy for increasing strength, scientists say.
But in a chicken and egg type debate, they differ over what's causing the increasing temperatures -- global warming that comes from behavior, or warming that is part of a natural cycle. Others cite changes in the way the intensity of hurricanes is measured and have questioned whether the storms are even generally stronger than they were years ago.
In the most recent studies that blame human influence for the warming, a chorus of scientists points to the connection between warming waters and more intense storms.
A new study by James Elsner, a Florida State University geography professor, in the journal Geophysical Research Letter, seeks to show that the air temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean influence the ocean's surface temperatures, not vice versa. Elsner's data lends more support to the idea that it is changes in the atmosphere that have created more and stronger storms.
Another climate researcher, Judith Curry, put forward the thesis in her research that increasingly high water temperatures have led to increasingly strong hurricanes. Kerry Emmanuel, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, argues that his work found such a strong link between higher water temperatures and the intensity of hurricanes that the connection cannot be an accident.
In a report about climate change, researchers from the National Academy of Sciences state that greenhouse gases are at their highest level in 400,000 years. They write that extreme weather, such as Hurricane Katrina, "may indicate a contribution from climate change, and the likelihood [that] extreme events could increase in the future."
One of the strongest opponents of this view is Christopher Landsea of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Hurricane Research Division in Miami, Florida. When US President George W Bush visited the center at the end of last month, Landsea said there is no consensus that stronger storms are a result of global warming.
Landsea wrote in a recent issue of the journal Science that poor measurements based on less sophisticated technology could have resulted in inaccurate classification of hurricanes in previous decades. Hurricanes that were category three would now be classified in a higher category.
Landsea and his supporters argue that natural causes lead to an especially active hurricane season every ten to 40 years followed by a less active season. This year's hurricane season, which began on June 1, has been much quieter than predicted, showing how varied weather can be.
Frank Lapore of the National Hurricane Center, says there are a variety of reasons why hurricanes have killed so many people and caused so much damage in the last several years. He attributes much of the damage to the migration of more people to the coasts during the 1970s and 1980s. Since 1995, more storms have been hitting the increasingly denser coastal population centers.
There is a "very increased probability that a major hurricane is going to make landfall in a very populated area," he said.
Lapore said he is upset by the travel industry that continues to encourage vacationers to visit endangered areas despite warnings. He is also concerned by the hurricane fatigue suffered by many people, who despite evacuations refuse to leave their homes because repeated warnings have desensitized them to the danger.
"It's almost a Greek tragedy," he said. "You know you are doomed, but you don't worry."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with