For more than two decades, the brutal military occupation of East Timor, a distant, impoverished territory, brought Indonesia little but disdain and dishonor on the world stage.
The ending, a bloody rampage by Indonesian-backed militias after a vote for independence in 1999, further curdled the nation's reputation and left a bitter mood at home -- where the loss of East Timor was treated as a subject best left untouched.
The seemingly closed chapter was reopened this month with a new book by Ali Alatas, the nation's former longtime foreign minister and ambassador to the UN. It is the first account by an Indonesian insider who tried to steer some of the sorry events -- which at critical moments involved the US, the UN and, at all times, the heavy hand of the Indonesian army.
Alatas, always amicable, always accessible, was respected in New York as a quintessential diplomat handed the tricky task of representing his country during the rule of the secretive and authoritarian leader president Suharto.
In The Pebble in the Shoe: The Diplomatic Struggle for East Timor, Alatas traces events from the Indonesian invasion in 1975 to the army's exit in September 1999, and the transfer of control to a UN peacekeeping force.
For the most part, he sticks to the narrow diplomatic history, rarely veering into what the army was doing on the ground, and mostly hinting rather than asserting that the army's actions made the diplomatic track so tortuous.
"I decided I would try to open up a debate and leave it to the reader to draw his conclusions," Alatas said in an interview.
The debate came immediately. A ceremony to celebrate the book's publication -- fashioned as a public seminar in the stately courtyard of the National Archives and attended by former army generals, Indonesian officials and foreign diplomats -- turned into an initial round of soul-searching, even catharsis.
Dino Patti Djalal, who served under Alatas and is now President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's most senior foreign policy adviser, told the audience that Indonesia had many stark lessons to learn from East Timor, describing the period leading up to the UN-administered referendum of Aug. 30, 1999, when the East Timorese voted overwhelmingly for independence.
Djalal said he had been sent by Alatas to visit the East Timorese leader, Xanana Gusmao, when he was still being held in a Jakarta prison.
Djalal had passed along a warning from Gusmao that the militias backed by the Indonesian army would create mayhem after the vote, but Indonesia did nothing to prevent it, he said.
"He said, `Dino, this thing about the militias is going to be a cancer,'" Djalal said.
"We never had the heart or the will to rein in the militia," he said, and added, "We paid very dearly."
The UN estimates that about 1,000 people died in the violence that analysts have said was turned on and off like a spigot by the military.
In his book, Alatas says that the looting, burning and killing after the voting was so bad that a delegation of Indonesian officials, including Alatas, was unable to leave the airport when the group flew to East Timor for a first-hand look.
He goes on to say, "I began to have serious doubts whether, even under martial law," the Indonesian troops "could control the situation, not because of technical incapability but because of wavering and indecisiveness to act strongly against the militias."
Djalal said that Indonesia fooled itself during its rule of East Timor.
"We spoke of winning the hearts and minds, but we didn't know what we were doing," he said. "East Timor became a police state; we were bribing people we thought were loyal to us and doing horrible things to people we thought were not loyal to us."
At another point in the seminar, a former Indonesian ambassador to Australia, Sabam Siagian, said that then US secretary of state Henry Kissinger had visited Jakarta just before the invasion of East Timor and had told Suharto that the plans for East Timor were acceptable as long as the operation was done "quickly and cleanly."
But, Siagian said, "it was neither quick nor clean."
In his account, Alatas says that the shootings of East Timorese protesters in November 1991 by the Indonesian military at a cemetery in the district of Santa Cruz was a "turning point" from which Indonesia never recovered.
The massacre was captured on videotape by a British filmmaker and shown worldwide.
"Since that date, international support for Indonesia's position inexorably declined while that for the independence movement in East Timor markedly increased," he wrote.
Soon afterward, the US cut military assistance to the Suharto government.
With Indonesia's image suffering so much in the international arena, Alatas wrote, he tried in 1994 to persuade Suharto of the wisdom of granting East Timor autonomy, a status that Alatas had long favored. He was listened to patiently, he records, but turned down.
If autonomy had been granted in the 1980s or 1990s, independence would not have been necessary, Alatas suggests.
To the astonishment of many, including Alatas, after Suharto's downfall, the new president, B.J. Habibie, quickly set the path for independence.
The title of his book comes from a remark Alatas once made to a Portuguese journalist who had asked him how he felt about the international stigma over East Timor.
Yes, he had answered, it was a problem for Indonesia, "but only as bothersome as a pebble in a shoe," Alatas said.
"In retrospect, however, I have to admit that in its final years, the East Timor problem was no longer a mere pebble in the shoe but had become a veritable boulder, dragging down Indonesia's international reputation to one of its lowest points," he said.
The troubles of East Timor came at a personal cost to Alatas. In the 1990s, he was a serious candidate for secretary-general of the UN.
But he has said that Suharto did not want him to pursue his candidacy. And friends of Alatas have said that the president did not want the exposure on East Timor that a campaign for Alatas would have attracted.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.