President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen's setting up a school to train national leaders followed in the footsteps of past authoritarian leaders, and Ketagalan has not managed to train any new talent. His choice to give the speech at his own political school was the most risk-free decision possible, and also the most authoritarian. This demonstrates that Chen only has the power of a president, not the demeanor.
As to the content of his speech, Chen mentioned national identity, political strife, transitional justice and the constitutional system, which indeed are difficult issues. His speech made sense, but the problem is that in more than six years as president, Chen has done almost nothing to solve these key issues, and has even become a source of problems himself. With his falling prestige, will he be able to accomplish anything in the remaining years of his presidency?
Chen talked of "partisan political fighting" in order to continue to use the Constitution as the basis of his refusal to step down.
He said that if a president does not to a good job, then the Constitution offers express provisions, including recall, impeachment or even a vote of no confidence in the Cabinet, all of which are very important parts of the constitutional order. He also said that if the president allegedly breaks the law or makes any mistakes, the judicial system is the correct venue for any investigation. Clearly, this is an important line of defense for Chen when responding to the political crisis and the attempts to force him out of office.
This line of defense is not unique to Chen: it also applies to democracy and the constitutional system. No one can say that Chen's insistence on following the constitutional system is wrong. However, several media outlets have persisted in putting pressure on Chen to step down. Many "deep throats" have exposed trivial matters related to his administration. These muckrakers have made a large number of sensational allegations about the president, most of which have turned out to be false.
These "information providers" and media outlets have ganged up and will not stop until they have destroyed Chen. This storm might eventually break through Chen's defensive lines, but will still have to withstand the test of the constitutional system.
Chen has used "the problem of transitional justice," to explain away his own improper behavior and find a positive explanation, but this is the wrong approach.
On the other hand, Chen has admitted that he has followed old "habits and irregular practices," and this is the main reason that he has been tagged as corrupt.
Drawing conclusions from this painful experience, Chen said that he hoped to be able to build a good system that everyone in Taiwan could rely on. This is the correct way to deal with the situation.
The Presidential Office should immediately set up a transparent system and discard dubious practices. If, however, one is stupid enough to follow old irregular practices that entail a violation of the law, even the president should be prepared to accept punishment and possibly even step down.
Chen also spoke of problems relating to the constitutional system. The crux of the matter is well known: if the system itself has problems, Chen, who has been in power for six years, should have already taken measures to allow the political situation to develop more smoothly.
In failing to do so, Chen has also failed to fulfill his role as president. He has concentrated too much power in his own hands, making governing more difficult. Chen's decision to delegate part of his power is proof of his mistakes.
Chen once said that his biggest dream in life is to create a new constitution for Taiwan, and that he will have everlasting regret if he cannot fulfill this dream. More and more, it seems like this will be one of Chen's everlasting regrets.
Chen ended by defending himself, saying: "It is like mountain climbing. I am leading the way in the front and I want the people behind me to have an easier climb. Although I may suffer cuts or even bleed along the way, I don't mind."
Chen has suffered not from leading the reform process, but as a result of his inability to govern the nation, having concentrated too much power in his own hands and being stupid enough to follow old irregular practices.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti and Daniel Cheng
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry