It needs to be made clear at the outset that I am of the opinion that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) should resign now and should have done so long ago. When former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (陳哲男) was detained on corruption charges, it was then apparent that President Chen had to step down. He must have known what Chen Che-nan was doing, and this is unforgivable. If he says he knew nothing, he should step down because that would mean he is incompetent.
But although the president should step down, there are legitimate fears about the methods used to force him out of office will be problematic. The worst possible outcome is that he is ousted by people taking to the streets.
It is true that the public laying siege to the Presidential Office or even paralyzing traffic in the surrounding areas may result in Chen Shui-bian's resignation. But while at the present time this is the only feasible method for driving him out of office, the use of demonstrations to force his resignation should be rejected.
Let's bear in mind that Taiwan is a democracy, and that a democracy is bound by the rule of law. Laying siege to the Presidential Office or paralyzing traffic is surely illegal. Using illegal means to achieve a goal, no matter how justifiable, is something we must not do, because this would almost amount to a revolution. Isn't it contradictory for a democracy to resort to revolutionary methods?
In advanced nations, relying on mass protests to unseat a president is unheard of. The US, which also has a presidential system, set a precedent for the resignation of a sitting president, but it was not the result of mass demonstrations. US president Richard Nixon decided to step down because senator Barry Goldwater said he would initiate impeachment proceedings against Nixon if he didn't resign immediately. Knowing that his time had run out, Nixon had to bow out.
In countries with a Cabinet system, the government can be unseated through a vote of no confidence. That is the case in European countries as well as in Japan, but in none of these countries has this been achieved through mass demonstrations. In the Philippines, demonstrations are sometimes used to oust a president. Following the disintegration of the Soviet Union, large-scale demonstrations and protests occurred in many of the new republics, often resulting in a change of presidents. Incidents of this sort are sometimes welcomed by the whole nation, but almost all of these states have remained politically unstable.
If the people use street demonstrations force Chen Shui-bian to step down, future presidents may also have to step down under similar circumstances. The public of course disapproves when government officials on occasion break the law. That is why demonstrations must be lawful, and why officials must also enforce the law.
In a democracy, the purpose of staging a demonstration is to make the government aware of public opinion, but this does not mean that the government has to follow the demonstrators' opinion. Citizens in a democracy must understand this.
This thinking may be conservative, for the president will not step down of his own volition. In addition, top leaders of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have decided to live or die with him. Thus, those who want him to quit can only express their opinion by voting. But if the DPP is hell-bent on covering up for a corrupt administration, it should be aware of the consequences.
If Chen Shui-bian can be unseated through public demonstrations, then future, president's may see their terms come to an end in the same way. If that happens, we will be the ones to regret it. This is a precedent that must not be set.
Lee Chia-tung is a professor at National Chi-nan University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under