Stabilizing the political situation, reinvigorating the economy, consolidating democracy and strengthening Taiwan are the core founding values of the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU). The TSU was established five years ago to help and consolidate the localized government led by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Although the TSU was opposed by some DPP factions at the beginning, it kept its focus on the big picture.
It is a matter of regret that even though the TSU has supported the DPP, some DPP members now take the arrogant approach that the TSU must support the DPP and must not compete with the DPP. Some pro-independence factions, civic groups and voters also think that the stronger party should be supported. They think that the TSU must concede in any competition with the DPP, saying that it lacks solidarity and is splitting the pro-localization effort if it does not.
A sober look at the DPP's six years in power still leaves one thinking that where there's smoke, there's fire. It is a matter of great urgency for the administration to engage in serious soul searching, bring about sweeping reform, give the public a sense of well-being and restore a feeling of dignity and glory to the Taiwanese people and those supporting localized rule. These are also the criteria the TSU will use to measure any future interaction with the DPP.
In other words, the TSU must serve the people of Taiwan by making the public's wishes, preferences and dislikes the party's mission.
Last year, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the DPP cooperated on a plan to amend the Constitution. They set such a high threshold on the public's fundamental right to initiate a referendum on creating a new constitution and changing the nation's title that doing so has become almost impossible.
In addition, the lack of appropriate measures to support the new single-member district, two-vote system violates the democratic spirit of "one man, one vote," setting the DPP up for an electoral loss before the next election has been held and putting the TSU in an even more difficult situation than before.
The TSU is not aiming to make an enemy of the DPP, but when the DPP fails to ensure the well-being of all citizens and the nation's dignity, when it can no longer rely on its reputation for being clean and supporting localization, and when it is no longer capable of winning the support of the majority, the TSU must forge its own road.
Localization should not be used as a veil by any political party to cover up impotence and corruption. The true meaning of localization is to ensure clean politics and honesty, and to look at Taiwan as a single community with a shared fate. A localized regime should work to bring happiness to all Taiwanese people.
Democracy should not be a tool to legitimatize either the DPP's arrogance or the KMT's one-party autocracy.
Localization and democracy should not be used to win elections or seize power. Corruption and the KMT's pretense that its stolen party assets are legitimate are the two major culprits undermining the localization and democratization of Taiwan. The TSU will not only keep a distance from corruption and strictly monitor the government, it will also call on the public to launch a signature drive to initiate a referendum aimed at reclaiming the KMT's stolen assets.
As an independent party, the TSU must not be absent from elections. However, the election process in itself is as important as the election results, which is why TSU candidates must remain clean, act with humility and garner public support one step at a time.
Shu Chin-chiang is chairman of the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs