During the last quarter-century, global economic growth has soared, but Africa continued to lose ground. Indeed, the continent's share of world exports fell from 4.6 percent in 1980 to 1.8 percent in 2000, and its share of world imports declined from 3.6 percent to 1.6 percent over the same period.
Africa's share of global flows of foreign direct investment (FDI) also fell, from 1.8 percent in 1986-1990 to 0.8 percent in 1999-2000. Can regional economic groupings, such as the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC), help increase trade and bolster growth?
Overall trade flows in southern Africa fell from US$131.1 billion in 2002 to US$112.3 billion in 2003, with South Africa -- one of only three countries in the region that recorded current-account surpluses -- accounting for 65 percent of the total. Whereas South Africa's foreign trade almost doubled between 1994 and 2002, exports from, say, Malawi to Tanzania or from Mozambique to Zambia remained negligible, despite their geographic proximity.
The low level of intraregional trade, despite the SADC and COMESA, reflects several factors, including a range of non-tariff barriers -- mainly communications and transport problems, customs procedures and charges, and a lack of market information. Moreover, in the past, southern African countries put their faith in protectionism and import substitution policies. Relying on "infant economy" arguments, major exports were restricted and legal obstacles were erected against foreign participation in the development of natural resources, as well as financial and other services, further impeding regional integration.
Nowadays southern African countries are committed to reinforcing their regional integration through economic harmonization. A regional plan approved in August 2003 in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania's capital, by the SADC focuses on promoting trade, economic liberalization and development as a means of facilitating the establishment of an SADC common market. This requires completing the formation of a free-trade area, with 85 percent of SADC trade to be liberalized in 2008, and 100 percent in 2012.
A common market -- including harmonized policies for free movement of factors of production -- will enhance competitiveness, industrial development and productivity. However, protocols and political treaties are not sufficient to boost integration. The major barrier is the region's great diversity in economic and institutional development. The SADC's regional plan establishes a timeframe for policy implementation over the next 15 years that takes these constraints into account, focusing on macroeconomic policies, debt problems and establishing a stable and secure investment climate.
Macroeconomic policy harmonization is needed to ensure that changes in one SADC member country do not adversely affect economic activity elsewhere. The new initiative calls for all member states to harmonize their economic, fiscal and monetary policies completely, beginning with currency convertibility and followed by exchange-rate unification and, finally, a common currency.
Several currencies have attained some measure of regional convertibility, which should encourage monetary harmonization and promote intraregional trade, as countries' trade flows shift from partners that require payment in foreign currency.
A form of monetary harmonization in southern Africa already exists between South Africa and Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland, whose currencies are traded at par with the South African rand. The Reserve Bank of South Africa implements monetary policy after consultation with the other countries' central banks. Despite tight monetary policy and foreign exchange regulations, the scheme has boosted trade and investment while reducing intraregional indebtedness.
But debt remains a grave challenge for southern Africa as a whole. The region's total aggregate external debt stood at US$75.6 billion in 2003, up from US$56.6 billion in 2000, with Angola, Mozambique and South Africa accounting for 75.9 percent of the total. Angola, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia owe an average of 150 percent of their GDP, and servicing the debt swallows billions of dollars annually.
Moreover, SADC has faced a sharp decline in FDI inflows, which fell from US$9.8 billion in 2001 to US$3 billion in 2003. This is attributable mainly to Angola, Botswana and Namibia, owing to cyclical investment behavior in the petroleum and extraction industry, and to South Africa, where privatization and acquisitions activity have slowed. Indeed, South Africa and Angola alone accounted for 73 percent of the region's inward FDI in 2003.
For southern Africa -- indeed, for the continent as a whole -- global competitiveness requires diversification to higher value-added and manufactured exports. In order to attract the FDI needed to achieve this, southern African countries have enacted laws aimed at encouraging greater private sector participation, with special emphasis on foreign investment. But, despite these efforts, FDI inflows in the region (excluding South Africa) remain too low to have a significant economic impact.
This reflects the real and perceived risks associated with investment in the region. Southern Africa's leading economies must therefore make every effort to promote regional integration. Removing all trade barriers, as called for by SADC's plan, would enable them to take full advantage of the region's abundant natural resources and point the way toward deeper global integration for all of Africa.
Gabriel Nahimana is economic affairs officer for the UN's Economic Commission for Africa.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs