Southeast Asia's club of nations, ASEAN, turned 39 on Tuesday and already it appears to be grappling with a mid-life crisis.
ASEAN, born out of the Cold War of the 1960s, began as a group of newly independent states dedicated to fighting communism and aching for stability.
Four decades later, on "ASEAN Day," the group has developed a middle-age obsession: economics. It's in a race to remain competitive against the emerging might of China and India.
And, so far, despite plenty of frustration with ASEAN's pace of reform, the club appears to be making some progress.
"Twenty years ago or more, there was a long-standing consensus that you shouldn't take ASEAN declarations at their word," said Natasha Hamilton-Hart, associate professor of Southeast Asian studies at the National University of Singapore.
"They were typically vague sort of statements of intent ... Often they were not intended to be followed by any hard, binding commitments. But I think that's changed," she said.
ASEAN is still a long way from becoming a kind of EU, which is only a decade older: there is no single market, it has a kaleidoscope of different currencies and political systems, and it still doesn't even exist as a legal entity.
But in the search for economies of scale, to avoid being robbed of foreign investment by China and India, ASEAN has made integration its mantra. It sounds like an EU in the making.
Its big dream is a "single community," where goods, services and labor flow freely across borders, and it is drafting a charter that could enshrine its recently declared adherence to democracy, human rights and the rule of law.
ASEAN also has a free-trade area, although it is riddled with temporary exclusions, and plans to put in place visa-free travel, to be followed by an open-skies airline policy.
"There are many steps that we need to take, in order to see the birth of an ASEAN community," Malaysian Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar told an ASEAN flag-raising ceremony on Tuesday.
That is an understatement -- especially given that ASEAN wants to become a single market by 2020, or within the next 10 years if a proposal to bring the date forward to 2015 is adopted.
Even ASEAN's supporters believe it would do well to achieve even some of what it has set out to do.
"We're not going to get the common market even of the type Europe had in the 1980s by 2015," said Manu Bhaskaran, a partner at economics consultancy Centennial Group in Singapore.
ASEAN's progress may be slow, and modest by EU standards, but it so far appears to be meeting the competitive threats from China and India, Bhaskaran added.
"ASEAN is beginning very slowly -- too slowly -- but they are beginning to make some of the painful decisions to really put progress on the road," he said.
Foreign direct investment dipped in China between 2004 and 2005, according to UN figures, while investment in two major ASEAN economies -- Thailand and Indonesia -- actually rose.
Last year, ASEAN states Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam were all tipped to perform well in terms of foreign direct investment in the medium term, according to a survey published by the UN Conference on Trade and Development.
Taken together, ASEAN encompasses more than 500 million people and has combined gross domestic product of more than US$800 billion, bigger than India, according to World Bank 2005 data.
As economic and social union beckons -- political union is still a bridge too far for ASEAN -- the group faces many barriers, including one of its own making: its founding principle of non-interference in a member state's domestic affairs.
Once held up as almost sacred to ASEAN, the principle has come under increasing pressure for review in the group's dealings with military-run Myanmar, which has shown little sign of moving toward democracy despite years of friendly prodding.
Myanmar's senior general, Than Shwe, used ASEAN Day on Tuesday to call for fellow members to abide by non-interference, but instead Malaysia's prime minister said non-interference might have to make room for ASEAN's new agenda: integration.
"That principle might require refinement, especially in the face of the onslaught of globalization," Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said in his ASEAN Day lecture in Kuala Lumpur.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with