As Japan decides whether it will submit Tokyo or Fukuoka as its candidate city for the 2016 Olympics, the Japanese Olympic Committee began a two-month evaluation of the cities' credentials on Aug. 1. Taiwan should take this opportunity to reconsider the challenges standing in the way of a 2020 bid.
In the past, many cities were not qualified to host the summer Olympics because of the major drain on resources that the Games presented. However all that changed at the 1984 Olympic Games in Los Angeles, when the US boldly incorporated a commercial approach into the events and ended up coming away with US$225 million in profit. Ever since that first lucrative Olympics, competition to host the Games has become tougher and tougher.
Aside from the clear financial and political advantages to hosting the Olympics, there are also many other hidden benefits. First, the opening and closing ceremonies attended by the International Olympic Committee chairman and the president of the host country are broadcast by international media around the world, and nearly every country on earth sends representative delegations to the Games. This presents an incredible publicity opportunity for the host country.
At the same time, it can lead to impressive growth for the host country and city.
Applying to host the Games is not easy. England, for example, experienced multiple failures before finally getting the right to host the Games in 2012. But even though the chances of success are slight, rejection is not necessarily a complete loss.
In 1993, Manchester, England, was denied the right to host the 2000 Games for the second time, but the application process energized the city as residents took it upon themselves to participate in the application activities. Afterward, the Labour Party conveniently used the application experience to lead a new urban renaissance movement and revamp Britain and its society. And although Vancouver failed twice to reach its goal of hosting the Winter Olympics, the focus and conviction shown by the residents was invaluable in itself.
Just as former premier Frank Hsieh (
People have given every kind of reason why Taiwan shouldn't host the Games, but all these objections have been heard in countries that have since hosted the Olympics. Taiwan is one of the top 10 most competitive countries in the world, and has a national income greater than those of Mexico and South Korea when they hosted the Olympics. If these two countries could do it, why not Taiwan?
It cannot be denied that Taiwan exists in a hostile international environment, and it goes without saying that even though the conditions may be ripe from a subjective perspective, Taiwan will, objectively speaking, still suffer from deliberate obstruction from countries like China. But how did Taiwan get the rights to hold the 2009 World Games? How is it that China's arrogant interference failed?
Evidently, it is a matter of how things are handled. During these times of political and economic chaos and unclear goals for the future, capturing the 2020 Olympics could serve as a wakeup call. The 2020 Games aren't just a dream: they could be a goal, too.
Liao Lin Li-ling is deputy secretary-general of the European Union Study Association-Taiwan.
Translated by Marc Langer
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry