On Thursday, the Administrative Supreme Court upheld the ruling of a lower court that struck down the Ministry of Transportation and Communications' selection of the operator of the electronic toll collection system (ETC) for the nation's freeway network.
The ruling is another blow for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, which is struggling with wave after wave of criticism over allegations of first family misconduct and poor government performance. For President Chen Shui-bian (
Making the government look even more silly was the sight of Premier Su Tseng-chang (
The ETC system has been a target of criticism from various quarters for months. In addition to complaints of excessive charges being imposed on motorists, the failure rate of the system's equipment attracted attacks from the opposition, especially the People First Party, which seems to take real pleasure from going after the government's record on transportation infrastructure.
Further complicating the situation were allegations that Far Eastern fabricated ETC test results to qualify for the bidding process. Lo and behold, last week three Far Eastern executives were indicted by prosecutors on charges of fraud and breach of trust for falsifying the results. This made the ministry look even worse for its defense of the bidding process.
The question that must now be asked is this: How can this mess be cleaned up while minimizing any inconvenience to the public?
Since the contract with Far Eastern has been declared invalid, who will run the ETC system? The ministry has said it will ask Chunghwa Telecom to temporarily co-manage the system with Far Eastern. However, a new tender process must take place.
Far Eastern has expressed reservations over participating in the bidding again. As for the other companies, the fact that the successful firm will have to take over the project midway through will surely dampen interest, despite the potential for profit.
From the ministry's perspective, then, ensuring a smooth transition and launching the system with minimal extra costs and delays will be a big hurdle.
There is also the problem that work already completed by Far Eastern must be paid for by the ministry as well. How to calculate the value of this work will give the ministry another headache and potentially give rise to another round of disputes between it and Far Eastern.
Su indicated last week that the most important thing was to learn lessons from experience. This is all very well, but it doesn't change the fact that some people just aren't capable of learning no matter what they experience, and that the patience of the public is running very thin these days.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry