The Council of Labor Affairs has recently been the focus of a number of news items. Labor rights groups have justly accused the council of bias against the interests of foreign labor, in favor of Taiwanese business interests. The present situation is deplorable and shameful.
Nothing was learned from the Thai workers' uprising in protest against inhumane treatment, exorbitant fees and restrictions on personal freedom. We read about workers forced to pay excessive fees for food and beds, workers spending 100 hours on the job but getting paid for only 40, and so on. Taiwan's reaction to this cruel, unjust treatment of guest workers was to quickly hustle them out of the country.
A Band-Aid solution was found: simply replace the council chairman, rather than engaging in a rigorous analysis of the problems followed by intelligent solutions.
The current chairman, Lee Ying-yuan (李應元), had the gall to claim to the people of Taiwan that these workers were actually overpaid, receiving more than Tai-wanese workers -- in spite of the fact that the minimum wage has been frozen for 10 years at NT$15,840, and that Taiwanese simply will not do the dirty, dangerous and degrading work given to foreign workers.
The greed and corruption stink to high heaven. Millionaire businesspeople always feel compelled to squeeze a little more blood out of their workers. Their incomes haven't been frozen for 10 years.
Apparently, it is impossible for the government to find any honest and compassionate people to handle these workers from among their own personnel, who evidently can be easily bought by business interests, so I propose the following initiatives.
The first initiative is to abolish the council in its present form -- that is, as a government agency -- and to immediately replace it with a new public agency under the jurisdiction of one of the country's philanthropic Buddhist organizations.
The second initiative is to change the name of the Council of Labor Affairs to the Council of Business Interests, to reflect its actual function.
The third initiative is to organize an international boycott of foreign labor, perhaps for a trial period of three months, so that the Taiwanese public can finally appreciate the contributions to the nation's economy and well-being, that are made daily by these foreign workers.
How does this look to the international community? We should be ashamed of ourselves.
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry