Following a series of penalties meted out to several financial institutions in recent months, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) has made it clear: It is not a paper tiger, and the market should watch out, because it is sharpening its claws.
But will these punishments prevent market irregularities from happening again? Can the FSC perpetuate a supervisory mechanism that will show it is not just bluffing? And most importantly, what kind of "market watchdog" does the FSC want to be as it celebrates its second anniversary this month, even as some of its high-ranking officials, including chairman Kong Jaw-sheng (
There had been concerns in the financial markets about the legitimacy of policies made by the FSC after Kong was suspended in May by the Executive Yuan for alleged jobbery in his previous position.
Acting chairman Lu Daung-yen (
Last week it fined Chinatrust Commercial Bank to the tune of NT$10 million (US$305,500) for taking advantage of regulatory loopholes in an offshore debt trading connected to its parent Chinatrust Financial Holding Co's controversial investment in larger rival Mega Financial Holding Co. The commission demanded that Chinatrust Financial offload a 3.9 percent stake in Mega Financial on the open market within a year. It also asked Chinatrust Commercial to punish other managers involved in the irregularities, a move that led to the resignation of the bank's chairman, Jeffrey Koo Jr (
So far this year, FSC has penalized a number of financial institutions with fines totalling more than NT$60 million. It has demanded management changes because of lenders' poor internal controls and lack of legal compliance. Industry heavyweights who were affected included Taishin Financial Holding Co's former supervisor Wu Tung-hsiung (吳統雄), China Development Financial Holding Corp's former board director Daniel Wu (吳春台) and Changhwa Commercial Bank chairman Chang Po-shin (張伯欣).
Yet, as market observers have pointed out, the fines and management changes won't restore the public's trust in the FSC overnight, since its former Examination Bureau director-general Lee Chin-chen (李進誠) was sentenced to 10 years in prison for his involvement in an insider trading scandal. The financial regulator's disciplinary actions may be a good start, but the financial markets are more concerned about the FSC itself. The key concern is whether the commission will be able to make its decisions independently under the ongoing situation of an acting chairmanship.
The FSC is facing an awkward situation, in which Kong has denied any wrongdoing, refused to resign and appealed his suspension to an Executive Yuan's petition committee. The constitutional interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices last week on the Organic Law of the National Communications Commission (國家通訊傳播委員會組織法) -- another independent administrative agency -- shed some light on the FSC's chairmanship dilemma.
Under the grand justices' interpretation, the Executive Yuan is the top administrative government office in the country, and is protected by the Constitution. Therefore there's no question about the premier's rights with regard to personnel arrangements at the NCC, FSC and other independent agencies.
But the administration needs to seek a responsible way to resolve the chairmanship problem if it wants to develop a financial regulator that has real teeth and is accountable to the financial markets.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs