Taiwan is at the crossroads again. While the agenda that the KMT and PFP have pursued is neither new nor accepted by the majority of Taiwanese people, the pan-blues want us to believe that we have nowhere to go at this juncture.
They argue that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is more corrupt than the KMT. Some from the pan-green camp have even started dancing to their tune, and called for the resignation of President Chen.
The pan-blue noise has been so loud because there has been little media coverage of alternative voices.
And the alternative is to move on from this crossroad. By so doing, the Taiwanese people will show the world that the nation has completed the first stage on the road to democracy.
In the last few years the nation has, under the Chen administration, achieved much. One achievement, whether we like it or not, is judicial independence.
Now, it is up to Taiwan to step up to the second stage, and the upgrade is also an important one.
The choice on this crossroads for Taiwan is obvious: Do we want to continue the democratic transformation to a normal society, or do we want retreat from it and accept the authoritarian habits that once dominated the nation under the KMT.
The Taiwanese have been unfairly treated for the past half century, and authoritarian habits are hard to cast off. The recent scandals surrounding Chen's family have placed the notion of individual responsibility on trial. Some want to see the results of the insider trading investigation and the Sogo saga before they cast judgment on Chen, while many others believe he is guilty by association.
Individual responsibility is seldom encouraged in Chinese culture. We have to learn to accept this burden in a normal society: that one has to be responsible for his or her behavior, but not that of his or her relatives or boss.
We should expect the Taiwanese to view their society in this way, and behave accordingly.
On the other hand, our leaders should should aspire to further several principles, such as justice, equality and fairness. Maybe it is too late to expect these qualities of Chen.
Over the next two years, Taiwanese must demand that their government help promote a society which is just, equal and fair.
If Chen cannot deliver, we will have to turn to someone who can in 2008.
Rao Kok-Sian
Winchester, Massachusetts
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.