The US-Indian nuclear deal, finalized in March, unequivocally heralds a new age in Indo-US relations. Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has praised the deal's potential to incorporate India into the non-proliferation community.
In Washington, however, many have criticized the arrangement as compromising the US' non-proliferation policy. A number of Republicans and Democrats have viewed the deal as contrary to decades of non-proliferation efforts. It has been alleged that inspections of Indian civilian reactors would not realistically limit India's ability to produce fissile material for weapons.
Furthermore, in the context of Iranian and North Korean nuclear ambitions, the US offer to India could provide an incentive for other states to pursue nuclear programs in hopes of a similar deal. Nevertheless, modified versions of the bill have passed through the House International Relations Committee with a vote of 37 to 5 and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by a margin of 16 to 2. Intensive lobbying efforts from Indian-US groups will most likely help ensure that the deal will pass the full house and senate before mid-term elections in November.
The nuclear deal is the latest manifestation of a US foreign policy that is conscious of new security challenges facing the US. Earlier this year, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called for transformational diplomacy, a shift in focus away from Europe toward emerging regions of the world like India and China.
The US has used many diplomatic tools to forge the alliance with India. The nuclear agreement is just one facet of a broader US-India defense pact negotiated last year that calls for increased cooperation between the US and Indian militaries in the future. For the most part, India has reacted positively to the US offer of friendship with Bush's rating among the Indian people consistently measuring higher than in the US.
Close ties between India and US ally Japan, exemplified by high level visits by Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi and Foreign Minister Taro Aso in the past year, provide growing evidence that India is gravitating toward a pro-US alliance in Asia.
The US decision to bring India back into the nuclear fold is undoubtedly influenced by fears of a rising China. As a democracy with a population and economic capacity to rival China, India could prove to be an invaluable regional counterweight against the People's Republic of China's expansion. While China's conventional and nuclear military capabilities currently far outmatch India's, the new nuclear arrangement could provide India with the civilian nuclear capacity to satisfy its energy needs and some leeway to bolster its deterrent capability against its neighbor to the north.
The recent failed test of the long range Agni 3 missile is a demonstration of Indian resolve to extend its deterrence capabilities well into the PRC. While India has repeatedly stated that it will only pursue a minimal nuclear deterrent, future US policymakers might not be inclined to chastise India for exceeding this capacity if it means a more stable buffer against Chinese expansion.
By all measures, regional relations between Asia's major players have improved drastically in the last few years. Improved economic ties between China and India have given rise to regular high-level talks between the two governments, a reopening of border trade and the declaration that this year is "China-Indian relations year." As an indirect result, India's relations with Pakistan have also warmed considerably, with rhetoric surrounding issues like Kashmir noticeably softer.
Nevertheless, the nuclear deal has again provided a stark reminder of the resilience of regional power politics.
China has actively attempted to constrain the expansion of Indian influence in several key areas. Beijing is trying to bring many of India's neighbors, including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, into the Chinese orbit and has extended its reach well into India's sphere of influence. China recently maneuvered itself into an observer position in the South Asian Agency for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and unsuccessfully lobbied to keep India, Australia and New Zealand from attending last year's East Asia Summit in Kuala Lumpur.
India's rising status could prove to be an obstacle to China's vision of a unipolar Asia where the PRC exerts a dominating influence. As expected, the PRC has expressed its displeasure with the nuclear deal by calling on India to abandon its nuclear ambitions.
Pakistan and China already signed their own agreement to enhance bilateral energy cooperation last February. Beijing offered to sell Pakistan six to eight nuclear reactors for US$10 billion earlier this year. The extent to which China is willing to risk straining relations with India by offering an extensive nuclear package to Pakistan remains to be seen.
During a time when Indo-Taiwanese relations are closer than ever, this recent round of maneuvering on the part of the US holds several implications for the nation. India has started to relax its once myopic interpretation of the "one China" policy to allow for more bilateral engagement with Taiwan. Economic ties between India and Taiwan have rapidly expanded in the last few years along with exchanges between academics, information-technology professionals and the formation of the Taiwan-India cooperation council.
Taiwan's current economic relationship with India pales in comparison with cross-strait trade and investment. With sufficient energy to support its growth, however, India's economic machine will expand even more rapidly in coming years, providing Taiwan with ample opportunities for meaningful economic interaction.
Taiwan and India share a common culture of democratic values and free enterprise, and both have strong interests in the information technology industry. As attempts by Beijing to actively constrain India's influence continue, India would likewise welcome strengthened relations with Taiwan as a means of applying reciprocal pressure on the PRC.
While the US-India agreement is not likely to spark a regional arms race or a second Cold War, it will make waves throughout Asia. Regardless of the consequences, Taiwan, India and the PRC can all take solace in the fact that the nuclear deal is undeniable evidence of the paramount importance of Asia in foreign affairs.
Mrinal Menon is a researcher at the Institute for National Policy Research in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.