President Chen Shui-bian (
At home, he has to contend with his wife Wu Shu-jen's (吳淑珍) deteriorating physical condition and her pleas for divorce for the sake of Chen's political career. He also carries the weight of his daughter Chen Hsing-yu's (陳幸妤) concerns, who has just given birth to her third son, while her husband Chao Chien-ming (趙建銘) has been indicted on insider trading charges. Prosecutors said last week Chao deserved an eight-year jail term.
At the office, aside from the non-stop political war that he must fight with the opposition parties -- including corruption allegations against his wife and aides, and the claims of incompetence -- he must also deal with attacks from his own side, including the recent call from pan-green academics to step down.
But it is in the worst of times that true leadership comes to the fore. It is now that the president should stand up and commit himself to the job at hand, making full use of his last 18 months in office. It is no time to turn back -- the legacy of the Chen administration depends on taking the initiative and looking forward.
If the issues are not directly apparent to the president, perhaps they need to be spelled out. Let's start with a few obvious points.
First, Chen needs to talk less and do more. The public will support policy proposals that produce substantive results -- they don't care what PR baggage cloaks it. They will also feel let down if he promises the world and delivers anything short of this.
A case in point: During the opposition's attempt to oust the president last month, Chen said he would dedicate more effort to cross-party consultation and negotiations, and seek a breakthrough on cross-strait talks. It's now mid-July. What has he done on either issue?
Let's go back a little further. When he was first elected president in 2000, Chen said he would seek to bring the perpetrators of the White Terror to justice and reclaim for the country the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) stolen assets. Those were heady days and the promises came thick and fast.
But six years have passed and little has been achieved on any of these fronts. The White Terror atrocities remain unaddressed and the KMT is having a field day cashing in its booty. What the public wants now is less politically motivated slogans and more promises delivered.
Next, the president needs to place his family in the background.
We might feel sympathy for Wu in light of her deteriorating health and feel empathy for a leader who obviously loves his family, but in truth these matters are personal and don't deserve the limelight that the media and Chen give them. The public's impression of the president is diminished when he goes on and on about issues that are clearly private. What the country needs now is a strong leader with a firm grasp of the national interest, not one that often sheds tears over family matters.
Other than talking less and pushing his family to the background, the policy areas the president could address with some urgency include: pushing ahead with the proposed statute on stolen party assets, speeding up the next stage of financial reform, selling off the government's multitude of state-owned enterprises, bringing the Lafayette frigate scandal to a close and ensuring the opening of the high-speed rail system. Indeed, the list of things to do is long and behind schedule.
Chen still holds the nation's top job. He should start to act like it.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under