Led by Wu Nai-teh (
The statement, entitled "The ethical crisis of democratic politics and Taiwan consciousness -- our call to the president, the ruling party and the Taiwanese people," has attracted much attention from all sectors of society. The statement is seen as deep reflection by the green camp, especially by pro-green academics and activists. It will inevitably bring pressure and have an impact on Chen and his family, who are allegedly involved in various scandals.
We should view such criticism against Chen and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) from two angles.
First, it reaches beyond the division between blue and green. If we continue to label the writers and countersigners of the statement as either blue or green, we will weaken the power of the statement and will gloss over and simplify the political spectrum.
Second, it is a call from intellectuals to those in power. Their call to Chen, the DPP and the people should be seen as an honest message to those in power. They have given their thoughts for the sake of Taiwan's democratization, hoping to strengthen the quality of democracy and the public's Taiwan consciousness. They value the establishment of systems above personal political gain. Especially, they emphasize the responsibilities we have to ourselves and coming generations. The hopes and bravery shown in the statement are touching.
Earlier this month, Presidential Office Deputy Secretary-General Cho Jung-tai (
This series of events offers a moment of reflection in the current political chaos. We must seize the chance to reconsider the relationship between intellectuals and those in power, or, more specifically, how we should tell the truth to those in power.
In modern society, interaction between knowledge and power is more complex. On the one hand, the establishment of the knowledge system, as well as teaching and research, depend on financial support from government agencies.
On the other hand, intellectuals must act according to their conscience and seek the truth using logic. But when knowledge encounters power, when the intellectual becomes the powerful and when we become arrogant after our knowledge becomes our profession, what kind of truths should we voice, and how should we speak them? Obviously, this is a thorny issue.
In his book, The Intellectual and Taiwan's Development (知識分子與台灣發展) published in 1989, late senior adviser to the president Tao Pai-chuan (陶百川) wrote, "The intellectual must always improve administrative performance and eliminate corrupt atmosphere using both criticism and admonishment."
He stressed, "Politics must always be criticized; power must always be restrained. Otherwise, politics will become decadent and rigid; power will be abused and corrupted. Criticism and admonishment are the intellectual's responsibility and right."
He clearly pointed out the attitude that intellectuals should take in the face of politics and power -- criticism and constraint.
Since intellectuals value honor, if aged Academia Sinica members have to stand behind government officials, we should condemn more than the arrogance and ignorance of the powerful. Intellectuals also have to review themselves when they fail to set an example.
Recently, triggered by the scandals involving Chen's son-in-law Chao Chien-ming (
This is in fact a rare opportunity for reflection, and it also serves as an example for other professions, such as the law and accounting professions. Since those are important professions in society, they are a benchmark for the nation's progression and maturity.
The various past accounting frauds, as well as public distrust of the prosecutorial and judicial systems, are a result of the lack of character and ethics training in Taiwan's higher education. They are also a result of Taiwan's long-term distortion and interference by political forces.
In his book entitled Representations of the Intellectual, the late Edward Said wrote, "Nothing in my view is more reprehensible than those habits of mind in the intellectual that induce avoidance, that characteristic turning away from a difficult and principled position which you know to be the right one, but which you decide not to take. You do not want to appear too political; you are afraid of seeming controversial; you need the approval of a boss or authority figure; you want to keep a reputation of being balanced, objective, moderate ...."
As Said said, such decline is the worst attitude an intellectual can adopt. Looking back at the statement, the 15 academics have decided not to avoid their responsibility and have told the truth to the powerful. They think that Taiwan's society must always believe in and pursue the fairness and justice it deserves.
Anyone who is entrusted with supreme power by voters should never abandon the promises they made, respect for the intellectual, or public expectations. Leaders should know when it is time to resign. As for Taiwan's intellectuals, how should we communicate with those in power, and what should we tell the coming generations?
The statement can be accessed at http://www.twcivilsociety.org/.
Jackson Yeh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs