Led by Wu Nai-teh (
The statement, entitled "The ethical crisis of democratic politics and Taiwan consciousness -- our call to the president, the ruling party and the Taiwanese people," has attracted much attention from all sectors of society. The statement is seen as deep reflection by the green camp, especially by pro-green academics and activists. It will inevitably bring pressure and have an impact on Chen and his family, who are allegedly involved in various scandals.
We should view such criticism against Chen and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) from two angles.
First, it reaches beyond the division between blue and green. If we continue to label the writers and countersigners of the statement as either blue or green, we will weaken the power of the statement and will gloss over and simplify the political spectrum.
Second, it is a call from intellectuals to those in power. Their call to Chen, the DPP and the people should be seen as an honest message to those in power. They have given their thoughts for the sake of Taiwan's democratization, hoping to strengthen the quality of democracy and the public's Taiwan consciousness. They value the establishment of systems above personal political gain. Especially, they emphasize the responsibilities we have to ourselves and coming generations. The hopes and bravery shown in the statement are touching.
Earlier this month, Presidential Office Deputy Secretary-General Cho Jung-tai (
This series of events offers a moment of reflection in the current political chaos. We must seize the chance to reconsider the relationship between intellectuals and those in power, or, more specifically, how we should tell the truth to those in power.
In modern society, interaction between knowledge and power is more complex. On the one hand, the establishment of the knowledge system, as well as teaching and research, depend on financial support from government agencies.
On the other hand, intellectuals must act according to their conscience and seek the truth using logic. But when knowledge encounters power, when the intellectual becomes the powerful and when we become arrogant after our knowledge becomes our profession, what kind of truths should we voice, and how should we speak them? Obviously, this is a thorny issue.
In his book, The Intellectual and Taiwan's Development (知識分子與台灣發展) published in 1989, late senior adviser to the president Tao Pai-chuan (陶百川) wrote, "The intellectual must always improve administrative performance and eliminate corrupt atmosphere using both criticism and admonishment."
He stressed, "Politics must always be criticized; power must always be restrained. Otherwise, politics will become decadent and rigid; power will be abused and corrupted. Criticism and admonishment are the intellectual's responsibility and right."
He clearly pointed out the attitude that intellectuals should take in the face of politics and power -- criticism and constraint.
Since intellectuals value honor, if aged Academia Sinica members have to stand behind government officials, we should condemn more than the arrogance and ignorance of the powerful. Intellectuals also have to review themselves when they fail to set an example.
Recently, triggered by the scandals involving Chen's son-in-law Chao Chien-ming (
This is in fact a rare opportunity for reflection, and it also serves as an example for other professions, such as the law and accounting professions. Since those are important professions in society, they are a benchmark for the nation's progression and maturity.
The various past accounting frauds, as well as public distrust of the prosecutorial and judicial systems, are a result of the lack of character and ethics training in Taiwan's higher education. They are also a result of Taiwan's long-term distortion and interference by political forces.
In his book entitled Representations of the Intellectual, the late Edward Said wrote, "Nothing in my view is more reprehensible than those habits of mind in the intellectual that induce avoidance, that characteristic turning away from a difficult and principled position which you know to be the right one, but which you decide not to take. You do not want to appear too political; you are afraid of seeming controversial; you need the approval of a boss or authority figure; you want to keep a reputation of being balanced, objective, moderate ...."
As Said said, such decline is the worst attitude an intellectual can adopt. Looking back at the statement, the 15 academics have decided not to avoid their responsibility and have told the truth to the powerful. They think that Taiwan's society must always believe in and pursue the fairness and justice it deserves.
Anyone who is entrusted with supreme power by voters should never abandon the promises they made, respect for the intellectual, or public expectations. Leaders should know when it is time to resign. As for Taiwan's intellectuals, how should we communicate with those in power, and what should we tell the coming generations?
The statement can be accessed at http://www.twcivilsociety.org/.
Jackson Yeh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations