The fairy tale of Zinedine Zidane vanished in an instant of visceral rage at the World Cup final. But what followed has proved strangely more compelling -- more human, more profound, more universal.
His now-legendary head butt -- a reaction to repeated insults -- fascinated viewers around the world, competed with wars for headlines and obsessed philosophers and sports fans alike.
And it elevated "Zizou" into an unlikely hero -- unrepentant and flawed, with an old-fashioned macho morality that has both captivated and appalled millions.
"Above all, I'm human," he said on French television last Wednesday, after three long days of silence following the brutal move that marked the end of his stellar, 18-year career.
The surreal week started on a Sunday night, in the 110th minute of a riveting World Cup final, with France and Italy tied 1-1 in extra time. Italian defender Marco Materazzi grabbed Zidane's jersey as a French attack on goal passed harmlessly by. The two exchanged words. Seconds later, Zidane spun, lowered his head and rammed Materazzi's chest, knocking him to the ground.
The next few days were a frenzy of worldwide condemnation and speculation: What, people asked, made Zidane crack? The head butt overshadowed the result of the Cup -- Italy won 5-3 in a penalty shootout -- and threatened to mar soccer's biggest spectacle.
In France, psychologists appeared on talk shows to ponder his motivations. Fear of success? Fear of failure? Childhood trauma?
Even before Zidane spoke out, the iconic French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy wrote in the French press of the "suicide" of a "demigod," calling Zidane a "super-Achilles" who was humanized by a head butt instead of a vulnerable heel.
Many intellectuals saw a certain grandeur in Zidane's act -- a gesture of tragic or existential revolt against the huge weight of expectation the world had thrust upon his shoulders.
Others questioned how a player such as Materazzi -- widely known as a ruffian on the field -- could dare interfere with the workings of a genius.
In a New Republic commentary entitled "Zidane's Priceless Headbutt," Luke Dempsey indignantly observed that the Italian "had the temerity to speak words to Zidane -- who dares speak to Debussy as he composes, to Victor Hugo as he writes, to Edith Piaf as she sings, to Monet as he paints?"
And the incident immediately became the stuff of pop-culture legend -- generating Internet jokes, an online game where users mow down a field of Materazzis, and fierce, parodic pop jingles about head-butting.
Last Wednesday, when the fallen icon spoke out at last -- in successive interviews on French television, with an olive-green military-style jacket draped over his shoulders -- many around the world seemed to be looking for any excuse to forgive.
"I apologize, to all the children" who watched the match, he said -- but he didn't repent, saying Materazzi had insulted his mother and sister so deeply he had no choice but to respond.
Zidane shifted the blame to Materazzi and editorialists across Europe followed his lead. On Thursday, prompted by Zidane's TV testimony, soccer's governing body FIFA summoned Materazzi for questioning.
Some commentators have not been so keen to overlook the transgression -- seeing in Zidane's act the morality of the vendetta, an outdated sense of honor and machismo that has oppressed women for millennia.
Mick Hume of the Times of London bridled at the suggestion that the head butt was anything but an act of thuggery.
"It is a sign of the strange times how many big moral debates now seem to be about the antics of footballers. Apologists for Zinedine Zidane have wasted the week trying to read some higher meaning into his assault, claiming it as a righteous blow [against] racism, colonialism and Islamophobia," he wrote.
Soccer coaches in American suburbs -- a world apart from the rough immigrant neighborhood in Marseille where Zidane grew up and learned the sport -- have held talks with kids about dealing with anger on the field.
But for many French people, Zidane -- his skills, character, and life story -- have a significance that transcends soccer.
A son of Algerian immigrants, Zidane had come to symbolize the bright side of a multicultural France struggling with ethnic tensions that exploded in riots in squalid housing projects last year. He led France to its only World Cup victory in 1998 -- then came back from retirement after he saw his beloved "Bleus" struggle in qualifying rounds.
The story of how Zidane and other aging veterans of the 1998 French squad defied all expectations and made it to the final became one of the great stories of the tournament and prompted wild comparisons -- for many, they were "Musketeers" banding together for one last campaign.
In the end, France seems content to hold on to the legend of the tragic hero Zidane -- flawed by the brutal morality of the housing projects where he grew up -- who rose to great heights, fell, then found a measure of redemption in the love his countrymen bear for him.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under