The following are excerpts from a conversation I had with some friends on issues concerning Taiwan's current political environment.
"After the transition of power in 2000, I looked forward to seeing the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) black-gold politics go. But six years later, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration is embroiled in a series of corruption scandals. How can I face my pan-blue friends? Who should we trust, the pan-greens or the pan-blues?"
"I understand your feelings, but I am not that pessimistic. We must understand that democratic nations are not free of problems. Rather they have the ability to deal with and eliminate existing problems. When democracy is guaranteed, there is no need to fear corruption, since scandals will be exposed."
"Yes, the third president of the US, Thomas Jefferson, once said that democratic politics is not based on trust, but on suspicion. At first, I did not understand what that meant, but now I do. All people have their weaknesses and limits; therefore, we must never rely on blind faith and entrust any single person or party with power. This is why we have a government with separation of powers, a system of checks and balances, opposition parties, limited government official terms and so on."
"Exactly. We also have freedom of expression, which allows the public to expose corruption and unfairness. This is another way of dealing with and eliminating existing problems. This makes me think of several US authors and journalists who exposed illegal relationships between officials and business in early 20th-century America. They exposed the exploitation of workers and filthy food handling in the meatpacking industry in Chicago, corruption in the governments of major US cities, illegal profiteering rackets involving the government railway construction companies, corruption involving trusts and government agencies, and many scandals involving the drug industry and media circles. Such revelations of corruption in the 1910s caused a reaction throughout US society and later became known as `muckraking.' What is worrying is that some of the muck is actually seen as something valuable and positive, as happened during the Chiang era."
"When the KMT was still in power, the DPP often said the KMT was good at corrupt practices and that if it ever became the opposition, their experience meant that they would be good at exposing corruption. This statement seems to make sense now that the KMT excels in exposing corruption, and it might be a good thing if it stayed in opposition; it would help expose corruption."
"From the perspective of their exposure of corruption, the KMT of course is a good opposition party, but in addition to muckraking, the party also slings mud in every direction. It blocks and opposes the government's every move, but also exposes any kind of unsubstantiated information in the hope of smearing and crippling the DPP administration. US muckrakers were independent and clean and nothing like our ugly and bellicose politicians who join hands with like-minded media outlets to engage in muckraking and mudslinging. They have skeletons in their own closets, but dig up dirt on others and freely throw that dirt around. This is nothing but political attacks and far from the operations of opposition parties in normal democracies."
"What's worse is that these people only dare dig up dirt on the localized regime, but nothing on China."
"This indicates that the KMT is not a suitable opposition party. But if the KMT regains its hold on power in the 2008 presidential elections, we will worry that black-gold politics will return and that China will ride in on their coat tails. What could we do?"
Lee Hsiao-feng is a professor of history at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under