On Jan. 10, 2002, a US military cargo plane landed at a US naval base in southeastern Cuba after a 27-hour flight from Afghanistan with 20 men aboard, shackled, handcuffed and blinded by blacked-out safety goggles. They were the first captives of the war on terror -- "the worst of the worst," US military officials said.
Their arrival in Guantanamo Bay founded a prison regime that has been condemned around the world -- and that now, four years on, could be on the verge of closure. More than 750 inmates have passed through the steel mesh cages since the Bush administration decided to establish an offshore prison that would be beyond the reach of the US Constitution and international law, where inmates would be subjected to open-ended interrogation and tried before military tribunals without the protection of the Geneva convention.
But it now appears that the White House has decided that the US can no longer afford the damage to its reputation and its relations around the world. Within the last two weeks, US President George W. Bush has said three times that he would like to close the camp, but was waiting for direction from the US Supreme Court.
"I'd like to end Guantanamo. I'd like it to be over with," the president said last Wednesday after meeting EU leaders in Vienna.
The court is expected to hand down a verdict soon that could outlaw the controversial military tribunals set up by the administration to try the inmates, and so demolish the legal foundations on which the detention regime was built. Several of the lawyers who have fought for the detainees to get their day in court say they see that ruling as a pretext for the administration to rid itself of a regime that long ago became a liability.
"When the president asks the Supreme Court to tell him that the detentions are illegal ... that means he wants to shut it down and is looking for ways to do it," said Bill Goodman, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, representing around 100 detainees.
The end is likely to come quietly. The prison population is already on the wane. No new inmates have arrived since September 2004, and the Pentagon says it intends to transfer 120 of the current 460 to their home countries. Sources said this week that arrangements were under way for the repatriation of the largest group of Saudi inmates in the history of the camp.
David Remes, who represents 17 Yemenis, believes that Guantanamo outlived its utility to the administration in 2004 when the Supreme Court ruled, in an earlier case, that inmates were entitled to challenge their detention in US courts. That, said Mr Remes, was the beginning of the end.
"Because Guantanamo can no longer serve its purpose, and because Guantanamo has become a symbol that contradicts everything the administration is trying to accomplish in the world, I think the administration would love nothing more, at this point, than to close it down and release most prisoners," he said.
Others describe Guantanamo as an "impulse buy" the administration soon regretted. The camp's first commander had 96 hours' notice to transform an ancient holding pen for Haitian and Cuban refugees to a high security prison for al-Qaeda suspects.
"The Bush administration boxed itself into a corner by the choices it made in treating the people at Guantanamo," said David Cole, a law professor at Georgetown University. "Had it given individuals hearings at the outset to ensure they were, in fact, fighters for al-Qaeda, had it treated them humanely while they were detained there, rather than coercively interrogating them, and had it asserted the authority to hold them only for the duration of the conflict with al-Qaeda -- rather than the duration of the war on terror, which is never ending -- I don't think Guantanamo would be a problem."
But the practicalities of dismantling the prison are daunting. For Guantanamo to go, prisoners must be brought to trial, or released. So far, only 10 have been formally charged by the much-maligned military tribunals. A study this year by a New Jersey law school found 90 percent of the inmates had nothing to do with terrorism.
That means the US must now release scores of men who, while innocent, have been branded as terrorists by virtue of their long stay at Guantanamo. While the majority are from Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen, there are also smaller contingents from two dozen smaller countries. So where do the former inmates go?
So far, the process of repatriating prisoners has been painfully slow, say detainee lawyers. In part, countries are nervous about taking back prisoners whom the US has labelled dangerous terrorists.
They are also frustrated with the stonewalling of US military officials when asked for evidence of links to al-Qaeda. But the host countries may also see the US' eagerness to rid itself of Guantanamo as a bargaining opportunity. Some of the prisoners are citizens of countries where torture is routine. If they return home carrying the stigma of Guantanamo, their lives could be in danger.
The US has indicated it will not take any of the detainees -- even those it admits are innocent.
European countries also appear unwilling. It took the US authorities nearly two-and-a-half years to find a safe haven for five entirely innocent Chinese Muslims it had been holding at Guantanamo.
The men were finally released last month in Albania. Human rights activists foresee similar problems for Libyans.
If they are to be brought to trial, in what court? It is highly unlikely that, after years of resistance, the administration would support trials of the Guantanamo detainees in US courts.
"They have tied both hands behind their back by holding them there, because it rendered everything they have said inadmissible in a US court," said John Sifton of Human Rights Watch.
It may allow them to be tried before military courts under rules set down by US military law and in compliance with the Geneva convention, but -- given Guantanamo's history -- those may not be seen as legitimate by other countries, said Clive Stafford Smith, who represents a Moroccan detainee.
But if Guantanamo does close, what then? Over the last few years, the US has moved its detention centers in the war on terror even further offshore. Closing Guantanamo will not bring those detainees closer to a courtroom, or spare them from possible abuse.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry