If Reader's Digest is to be believed, Taipei is home to some of the world's rudest, most callous and most uncaring humans on the face of the Earth. That may be exaggerating the results of the magazine's recent international survey, but it's a tempting exaggeration, especially as the survey says that New York is now the most polite city in the world.
The magazine used the following variables to measure politeness across different cities: "document drops," in which a person drops a bundle of papers on the street and expects others to help pick them up; "door tests," in which unwitting people are assessed on their willingness to hold doors open for others; and "service tests," in which staff were monitored over whether they thanked customers for their patronage (in New York, all of these tests were conducted in Starbucks stores, which seems more of a plug for the coffee franchise than a genuine attempt at experimental validity).
The point has been made that these tests were remarkably biased toward Western conceptions of politeness, although even by this standard it seems odd that Taipei should rank so low on the first two tests. Another factor not discussed in the magazine's article is the potential effect of tipping culture on American staff: if there is a much more direct economic mandate on polite behavior, how can this be compared with what goes on in cities that do not tip?
The politeness survey article in the online US edition of Reader's Digest concentrates on New York to the exclusion of all other cities in the survey. That's not very polite. Presumably the same pattern holds for other editions; if so, Reader's Digest readers are interested only in their own cities, even in the context of a global survey. That's not very polite, either.
The survey made no mention of differing expectations of what constitutes polite behavior in different societies, and with only three variables being used, it hardly covered the richness of human behavior, polite or otherwise.
More intelligent editors at this famously conservative magazine would themselves concede that the survey was more of an international marketing exercise than a serious comparison of cultural mores (Reader's Digest is published in all 35 cities that took part). This is why it should not be taken seriously. But it does offer an opportunity to reflect on Taipei's image to overseas visitors.
If tourists can endure the genuine surliness of CKS International Airport's immigration officials and the perfunctory manner of many of the bus drivers from the airport to Taipei or elsewhere, then what remains is by any standard a refreshing surprise for those who travel widely in countries whose languages they do not speak.
In the end, the pressing issue for foreign visitors to this country is not whether the average person holds open doors or helps pick up papers, but whether people providing essential services can speak adequate English or Japanese, whether police are capable of doing their jobs properly in times of emergency, and whether signs in obvious tourist or business destinations are sufficiently multilingual.
The people of Taipei need not feel disturbed by silly surveys -- there are enough of them as it is. But things can definitely be improved at an administrative level. The form of politeness in this country that needs more work is institutional, not social.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under