The Taipei City Council passed a motion on June 7 to remove President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The question of whether administrative regulations issued by the central government are legally binding on local self-ruled agencies depends on the kind of issue being regulated. If the issue falls under self-rule regulations or is part of the agency's internal management, then that administrative regulation is not binding. In the case of delegated authority, however, the academic interpretation is that administrative regulations are a matter of supervision, and that such administrative regulations are therefore also binding at the local level.
The president is the nation's leader and represents the country, as clearly stated in Article 35 of the Constitution. To respect the president is to respect the nation as represented by its highest office, and not the individual. How government agencies display the portrait of the nation's leader is a matter of respect for the country, and the country should have in place regulations that ensure its unity and cohesion.
Article 111 of the Constitution states that the central government's authority shall be carried out by all levels of government, which clearly makes it a matter of delegated authority. That means that city councils in special municipalities are also bound by such regulations, and Article 43 of the Local Government Act (
The problem is that even though the above guidelines are applicable in this case, there is no way to enforce them. If the council is determined not to display the president's portrait in violation of the guidelines, what can be done? The law requires only a minimum of morality, and there is no hope of using the law to induce the people to love their nation.
The Act Governing the Punishment of Police Offenses (違警罰法), which was rescinded in 1991, stated that a person who fails to salute the president or display the flag at public assemblies is subject to a fine of up to NT$1,000. The act was often derogatively referred to as the Patriotism Enforcement Provisions. In the 1990s, the Cabinet submitted a draft of the Act of the Maintenance of Social Order (
But political wrangling should have its limits. The right to express political opinions is a separate issue from the need to follow regulations. A council speaker's decision on whether or not to implement an invalid motion is a matter of political character. It is also an expression of respect for the Constitution and maintaining order. We hope that concerned leaders will proceed carefully and thoughtfully.
Liu Wen-shi is an adviser in the Ministry of the Interior and executive secretary of the ministry's Laws and Regulations Committee.
Translated by Max Hirsch
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under