There are two ways to interpret Latin America's recent election results.
First and most obviously, the supposed turn to the left is running out of steam, fast. In recent weeks, the hyper-nationalist Ollanta Humala, a clone of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, was defeated in Peru, the conservative Alvaro Uribe won a landslide victory in Colombia, with 62 percent of the vote and Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has fallen behind in the campaign for Mexico's July 2 presidential election. All of these isolated developments seemingly contradict the leftward trend in Latin America.
But there is another way of looking at these events. Yes, President Uribe won re-election, but the big surprise in Colombia was the end of the two-party system that had dominated the country for decades and the emergence of the left-wing Polo Democratico as the second largest political force in the nation.
Similarly, while Alan Garcia won in Peru, he does not come from a hard-left party that has finally seen the light -- like Lula da Silva in Brazil, Michelle Bachelet in Chile and Tabare Vazquez in Uruguay. His APRA party, founded by Victor Raul Haya de la Torre in the 1920s, is one of the region's oldest and most anachronistic populist organizations.
Like Chavez in Venezuela, Kirchner in Argentina, Evo Morales in Bolivia and Lopez Obrador in Mexico, President Garcia belongs to the unreconstructed left that springs from the great Latin American populist tradition. He may have learned many lessons from his disastrous presidency in the 1980s, but he is much closer to the wrong left than to the right one. In Mexico, Lopez Obrador has both begun picking up in the polls in recent days and showing his true colors, promising the stars and the moon to the Mexican electorate.
In fact, the more important recent developments within the Latin American left may lie not so much in the horse race results of elections, but in the growing differences between modernists and revanchists, between national interests and ideology. As Morales cozies up to Chavez and Fidel Castro more quickly than most people expected -- nationalizing Bolivia's natural gas, inviting large numbers of Cuban doctors and advisers to his country and signing myriad cooperation agreements with Venezuela -- he is also fueling increasing tensions with Brazil and Chile.
Both countries are his neighbors and, in theory at least, their leaders are his ideological soul mates. But the differences between the modern and archaic left and the three countries' contradictory national interests, seem to be trumping more superficial political affinities.
For example, Sao Paulo, Brazil's industrial powerhouse, now depends for most of its energy on Bolivian natural gas. As a result, Petrobras, the Brazilian energy company, has invested huge sums in Bolivia in everything from exploration to pipelines. Now, with the election of Evo Morales, the main source of Petrobras' natural gas has suddenly been nationalized.
Indeed, domestic royalties on Bolivian gas production are being increased by more than 50 percent and the price charged to Bolivia's foreign clients may well be doubled. Contracts are being respected only in the breach and technicians and lawyers from PDVESA, the Venezuelan oil giant, are auditing Petrobras installations in Bolivia. Lula wants to be nice to Morales, but he can't be nice to his expropriating neighbor and at the same time keep the industrialists and consumers of Sao Paulo happy.
Similar frictions are arising with Chile. President Bachelet would like to solve the century-old problem of landlocked Bolivia's access to the Pacific, but is finding this task to be trickier than expected, as Morales increases gas prices and reduces gas exports to Argentina, Chile's largest foreign supplier of energy. Nor does Morales' rhetoric help: accusing the US of attempting to assassinate him, as he did last week, does not endear him to the elites of a country that has signed a free-trade agreement with the US and whose president will be visiting Washington soon.
At the end of the day, Bolivia's immediate national interests may be served by Morales' strategic alliance with Cuba and Venezuela. On the other hand, Chavez's unabashed meddling in the Peruvian elections may have so alienated Alan Garcia that he actually becomes a European-style social democrat and Lopez Obrador may deliver on his promises to respect NAFTA, adhere to macro-economic orthodoxy and pursue good relations with the US.
But the cleavage between the two lefts in Latin American is steadily deepening. This is inevitable, because that rupture is being fueled by the simple acknowledgement that responsible governments must place national interests ahead of nostalgia, grandstanding rhetoric and strident ideology.
Jorge Castaneda, former foreign minister of Mexico, is a distinguished professor of politics and Latin American studies at New York University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.