When taking a look at our educational system, a question often comes to my mind: Should our classrooms be compared to battle fields, execution grounds or factories?
Today, in the eyes of students, classrooms are like factories. Students are the unfinished products on the production line, while knowledge forms the machine parts that are incessantly crammed into students' heads.
The reason why classrooms are like battle fields is because students must "not trail behind at the starting point," and must fight their way through many obstacles. Even before they graduate from junior high school, they have already been put through all sorts of competitions and examinations.
At the same time, classrooms are similar to execution grounds because immediately after a student makes a minor mistake, he or she will inevitably be reproached. After making a major mistake, he or she will suffer various humiliating punishments.
The analogy between classrooms and "battle fields, execution grounds and factories" also applies to teachers. Teachers are like assembly line workers, given their teaching schedules of more than 20 hours a week. They not only have to face large classes of over 40 students, but every year the required syllabus seems to get larger. Moreover, teaching is like fighting a war because teachers can be blamed for students' poor results in competitions and examinations, or for their poor conduct, and this is used as criteria for judging the teacher's overall performance.
Today, school principals are afraid of being antagonistic toward legislators, and legislators are afraid of reporters. Given that parents are backed by legislators and reporters, teachers are put in a weak position since they are not allowed to make any mistakes without facing ignominy and punishment.
Instead of making these comparisons, we should instead ask why we cannot make Taiwan's classrooms a place for practice, a place where mistakes can be made and where there is room for performance and enjoyment.
A practice venue implies that students can fully display their talents and learn through their mistakes. Enjoyment implies that students can discover what interests them and receive self-affirmation from the results. Performance implies that by means of music, arts and other creative activities, students can learn how to overcome and transform their anger, pride and other negative emotions while at the same time developing empathetic understanding, self-esteem and other positive emotions.
People may regard this as overly idealistic, because parents generally believe that corporal punishment is required to teach children. But parents who are experienced in educating their children understand that, for example, the best punishment for a child who likes to watch television is a prohibition on watching TV, rather than corporal punishment or verbal abuse. More importantly, this approach allows students to reflect on the reasons behind the punishment.
Today, what is the most worrying in our society is the rapid loss of a sense of honor. In fact, this phenomenon is not strange at all, because our educational system, being like a factory, a battle field and an execution ground, constantly strengthens students' sense of fear, and does nothing for their sense of honor. If the price to pay for making mistakes is being verbally abused, then students will work hard simply out of a fear of being punished. But this thinking can lead students to give up their positive identities and lose their ability to be creative.
For kindergarten and elementary school students, most classrooms are areas for practice, play and performance. But as they grow older, more and more of their classrooms become battlegrounds, or occasionally execution grounds. Although learning through trial and error and through performance may not make all children happy all of the time -- they will still face numerous challenges and frustrations -- it will at least not smother their creativity and will uphold their sense of individual dignity and honor.
This will not only liberate students, it will liberate teachers.
Bob Kuo is a professor of Information Systems at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under