Sunday marked the 17th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, in which the Chinese government brutally cracked down on pro-democracy protests sparked by the death of popular reformer Hu Yaobang (
The Chinese authorities have never expressed any regret over the way they handled the incident, and continue to suppress any reflection by officials or the families of those who died on that tragic night. State-controlled press ignores each anniversary.
A lot has changed in China since 1989, with economic reform continuing at breakneck speed. The Chinese Communist Party has used increased prosperity as a tool to maintain its stranglehold on power.
However, those reforms have caused growth in many coastal areas to far outstrip that of the hinterland, and the wealth accumulated by city dwellers has caused a massive income gap to develop between urban and rural residents. Those left behind by reforms have begun to protest, causing headaches for the communist leadership.
But Beijing has not budged one iota on democracy since 1989, and the Chinese people still have no choice when it comes to who represents and makes decisions for them at the national level. Beijing's attitude was made crystal clear by President Hu Jintao (
Compare Hu's ignorance of democracy with Taiwan's thriving, some would say chaotic, system. Yes, the nation's democracy has many problems, but surely not even the most ardent pan-blue supporter, angry about all the recent alleged corruption cases, would want to trade their right to protest against the government for a muzzled life in China.
One editorialist has already noted how Beijing's plan to blacken the name of President Chen Shui-bian (
There is another way for Taiwan to highlight the difference between the two nations and their systems at an international level and demonstrate the benevolence and respect for human rights found in Taiwan: Grant political asylum to two Chinese democracy activists being held in detention. Yan Peng (
But to our shame, rather than providing these brave men a platform from which to denounce China's oppressive autocracy, the government is busy trying to find a third country for them to claim asylum in. This is a difficult task nowadays as free nations around the globe, including Taiwan itself, are quick to cave in to China's economic pressure.
Although Taiwan claims to be a nation that respects human rights, it seems like the government and opposition parties are more interested in welcoming Chinese tourists and their bulging wallets than helping Chinese dissidents secure a free life here.
What better way could there be for Taiwan to commemorate the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre than to grant these two men -- and any others who manage to escape the clutches of China's brutal dictatorship -- the right to remain in Taiwan and teach local people about the true horrors of the present Chinese regime.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under