Early last monday, the opening day of the 59th World Health Assembly (WHA), representatives from the Taiwan United Nations Alliance (TAIUNA), the Sin Lau Hospital under the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan (PCT) and four priests arrived at the office building of the WHO where we waited in line to collect our visitor permits for the WHA meeting.
We were the first to arrive. Wang Ai-lan (
Oddly, unlike the situation in 2004, China did not mobilize overseas students to collect permits. I knew instinctively that a lively debate was unlikely, and that the meeting was certain to refuse Taiwan's request to participate as an observer at the WHA.
As expected, China was last to speak at the meeting, so Taiwan and other countries were unable to refute it. This time, Beijing clearly opposed Taiwan's entry to the WHA and its peripheral organizations, such as, the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network. China's Minister of Health Gao Qiang (高強) also repeated the rules laid down some 35 years ago, saying that since Taiwan is not an independent sovereign state, it is not qualified to join the WHA or to be invited to act as an observer.
He then spent a lengthy period of time explaining that there was no need for Taiwan to join the WHA since its exclusion would not affect disease prevention in the nation or internationally.
He said that China has done much to help Taiwan's disease prevention work by, for example, providing disease information, inviting Taiwanese experts to study in China and allowing them to attend certain WHO conferences.
He even said that thanks to Chinese efforts, Taiwan's prevention capacity has been greatly improved, to the point where it has been able to keep avian flu at bay.
Kao also made a big deal of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-Chinese Communist Party economic forum held last month, saying it proved that Sino-Taiwan relations are sound, and that the people of China are concerned about health issues in Taiwan.
In response to this claim, we really should ask KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), former chairman Lien Chan (連戰), and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to clarify their personal positions on the following issues.
One, China says that Taiwan is not an independent and sovereign state. Do you agree?
Two, several Chinese provinces have been affected by bird flu, but China still claims that the reason the disease has not hit Taiwan is that Beijing invited Taiwanese experts to visit China and attend the WHO's conferences. Do you believe this? Do you agree?
Three, are you willing to put the public health of Taiwan, which enjoys first-class health facilities and medical care, in the hands of China with its second-rate health facilities and medical care?
Four, China continually blocks Taiwan's efforts to enter the WHA and peripheral organizations. Do you agree with this? Do you dare oppose these actions?
Five, China says that the participation of Lien and Taiwanese tycoons in the joint forum proves that the nation does not need to enter the WHO or become a WHA observer. Do you agree?
Six, about 83 percent of the Taiwanese public hope that the nation can join the WHO as a member state, not an observer. Ma, do you dare to express these wishes to China?
Taiwan's WHO bid is a national affair. The KMT and PFP should not care only about the establishment of cross-strait links. Let's all pay attention to and support the WHO bid.
Twu Shiing-jer is a national policy adviser to the president and a former minister of the department of health. Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with