Deputy US Trade Representative Karan Bhatia's remarks on Friday that it was not the right time to initiate free-trade talks between Washington and Taipei were not unexpected. It's not the first time the US government has said so. The message from Bhatia also did not appear to catch the government off guard, because the two governments have different strategies in terms of their pursuit of bilateral free-trade agreements (FTAs).
Bhatia -- the highest ranking US official to visit Taipei in six years -- did not outright reject Taiwan's FTA request during his two-day visit for a fifth round of Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) talks. But he said as humbly and diplomatically as possible that US congressional restrictions prevented the administration from taking on any additional FTA partners before US President George W. Bush's trade promotion authority expires in June next year.
Taiwan, as the US' eighth-largest trading partner, ranks higher than many countries with which the US has concluded such agreements -- such as Chile, Jordan, Morocco and several countries in the Central America. As such, Taiwan believes it deserves a higher priority for a trade pact. It appears that President Chen Shui-bian's (
The US, on the other hand, focuses its FTA talks mainly on geopolitical considerations. Washington's decision to sign a deal with Singapore in May 2003, for instance, was due to the city-state's position as a hub for FTA networks inside both ASEAN and the Asia-Pacific region. Still, the US also weighs FTA talks on whether they can generate economic benefits for its business community and are in US interests in general, under the WTO framework.
The speech given by Bhatia on Friday to the American Chamber of Commerce in Taipei only made this point more clear. He said that Taipei's priority should be working to remove cross-strait economic restrictions and pursuing policies consistent with the evolving strategies of multinational businesses -- who he said feel compelled to relocate from Taiwan under the present circumstances. Naturally, Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) responded strongly on Saturday, saying that any lifting of cross-strait restrictions should be more an after-effect of, rather than a prerequisite for, Washington concluding a FTA with Taipei.
Nevertheless, while the need for bilateral free-trade links is increasingly recognized by countries all over the world, Taiwan does differ from the US not just at the business level but at the strategic level. The question for Taiwan is whether the government can outgrow the previous trade policy, which blindly follows the US.
While the need to seek a FTA with the US still exists, the government should rethink its FTA targets. It should continue to seek FTAs with allies in Central American and try to overcome the China factor by pushing forward free-trade consultations with countries such as Singapore, Chile and Mexico.
The selection of these three nations is not coincidental: each has consolidated its position as a regional hub -- like Singapore in ASEAN, Chile in the Southern Common Market and Mexico in the North American Free-Trade Agreement.
If Taiwan can conclude agreements with these nations, Taiwanese businesses will be able to make inroads into these countries and gain free access to the European and US markets by utilizing their FTA networks.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry