US President George W. Bush stepped to the right and left at the same time on immigration: courting conservatives with tough talk of sending the National Guard to the border and seeking to reassure moderates that a guest-worker program will be part of the mix.
"These are not contradictory goals," he declared in a televised address. Neither side seemed reassured.
Bush's Monday night speech from the Oval Office was an attempt to prod lawmakers and break a long-running political impasse, one that has social conservatives at odds with their business-community brethren as an election to determine the makeup of Congress approaches.
Raising the stakes in the immigration debate, Bush is proposing to use up to 6,000 National Guard troops along the border with Mexico. That idea was designed to appease the Republican right, particularly those supporting the House-passed immigration bill that would increase enforcement, call for constructing 700 miles of fencing and make being in this country illegally a serious crime.
At the same time, Bush is insisting, as he has since he was governor of Texas, on a guest-worker program and a path to citizenship for many of the 11 million to 12 million illegal immigrants now in the country.
He challenged Congress to "honor the great American tradition of the melting pot, which has made us one nation out of many peoples," in addition to better defending the southern border.
That drew barbs from both sides of the political spectrum.
"It's amazing how tone-deaf this man is. This is the No. 1 issue that will lead to the takeover of Congress by Democrats," said longtime conservative activist Richard Viguerie. "The White House doesn't seem to have receivers. They only have transmitters."
Senator Richard Durbin, delivering a Democratic response, said Democrats were "willing to support any reasonable plan." But, he said, Democrats would not go along with "a plan cobbled together to win political favor."
Bush's intervention came as the Senate was debating the issue, and as the president seeks to rebuild support for a key element of his domestic agenda in a midterm election year that has seen an erosion of public support both for him and for Republican lawmakers in general. It is a particularly hot issue for Republicans in the border states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California.
It is the first time Bush has spelled out his program in such detail. And using the official Oval Office as the setting for his speech increases pressure on Republicans, who control both the House and the Senate, to make tough choices.
It also poses pitfalls for Democrats, who must decide whether to seek actively a bipartisan compromise with the president or block the effort in hopes of scoring political points.
"This moves things forward. But some of the Democrats are using this as a wedge issue. They don't want it resolved. They want to use it to help mobilize the Latino vote," said James Thurber, a political scientist at American University.
Thurber rated it "difficult if not impossible" for Congress to find common ground.
The administration argues that the use of National Guard troops, whose ranks have already been thinned by deployments to Iraq, would only be temporary to support the Border Patrol while it builds up its own resources.
"Our party needs to be to be for a long-term solution for securing our border," conservative Republican strategist Greg Mueller said. "Immigration in the post-9/11 world is now a national defense and national security issue. To continue to succeed in elections, we must be the party of national security and national defense, and securing the border is top of the list."
"I think the conservative movement right now is somewhat frustrated and starting to let that be known," Mueller said.
Conservatives, traditionally Bush's base constituency, have been increasingly outspoken in criticizing the president and the Republican-led Congress, expressing unhappiness with the immigration debate, government spending and the war in Iraq. They also want the president and Congress to do more on social issues, particularly same-sex marriage and abortion.
Karl Rove, the deputy White House chief of staff, said he knew there was some grumbling within the Republican party about the president's immigration proposals.
But, he said, "This is about getting the right policy and the politics will take care of itself."
"This is a problem of security. It is a problem of our economy. It is a problem of compassion. It is a problem that we have to attack on several different fronts simultaneously if we hope to resolve it," Rove said.
With the president's job-approval ratings at the low point of his presidency, "We're in a sour time," Rove acknowledged. "I readily admit it."
Still, he said, "We're going to be just fine in the fall elections."
Part of the problem for Republicans is many business owners and leaders, historically a core Republican constituency, favor liberalized immigration laws.
"Big business wants more immigrants. But most of the folks who come in are of lower skills," said Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business.
"It's unlikely Congress is going to create a situation where we emphasize higher-skilled immigrants as a trade-off for closing the border for lesser-skilled immigrants," he said.
"In reality, the situation is far beyond anyone's control," Morici added.
He said that right now, illegal immigrants make up about 5 percent of the US workforce.
"Their impact on the US economy is so profound, it cannot be reversed," he said.
Bush was ordering as many as 6,000 National Guard troops to help improve enforcement at the Mexican border, part of a US$1.9 billion package.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with