Both US Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick and American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Stephen Young have made recent comments on the cross-strait situation. Some of their comments were new, and they also contained some important messages from the administration of US President George W. Bush.
First, during a hearing in the US House of Representatives International Relations Committee, several pro-Taiwan representatives asked if the US decided not to permit President Chen Shui-bian (
To give Congress a clear picture of the administration's position, Zoellick used stronger words than he has in the past, saying that the arrangement for Chen's transit was decided by Washington itself.
"We make our own decisions," Zoellick said. In response to repeated questioning, he emphasized that keeping one's promises is the most important thing in both politics and diplomacy, hinting that the US did not allow Chen to transit through New York in order to make him pay for past words and deeds.
Zoellick also pointed out that it is a good thing for the US to demand that foreign leaders take responsibility for their promises. Since "honesty is the best policy" is a value deeply rooted in the US psyche, his blunt remarks touched many of the Congressional representatives.
When Taiwan eventually mends its relations with the US, it should never again take advantage of representatives' goodwill toward our country.
Next, as the key US figure responsible for China policy, Zoellick also pointed out that the US will not support Taiwan independence; nor will it dance to the tune of Taiwan's politicians. "Because let me be very clear: Independence means war ... There are big stakes here, where lives can be lost," he said. On the same day, during a speech at the American Chamber of Commerce in Taipei, Young said that Zoellick is opposed to Taiwan independence.
However, Young later corrected his remarks, saying that he should have said "we don't support" Taiwan independence.
Moreover, Zoellick said that "I think [Taiwan] is going to keep hitting into a wall" if it repeatedly attempts to challenge the US "one China" policy. Obviously, his words were more straightforward than those of former US deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage, who complained in 2004 that Taiwan is probably the biggest "landmine" in Sino-US relations.
Zoellick's testimony shows that the US will watch Taiwan's every move closely in the next two years. In his speech, Young deliberately echoed Zoellick's comments, stressing that Taiwan must handle the amendment of its Constitution with caution and without touching on Taiwan independence, lest it arouse US concern.
Bush's move to directly handle Chen's transit issue has echoes of US Vice President Dick Cheney's China visit in April 2004, when Cheney intimated for the first time that the US and China have a consensus on preventing Taiwanese independence.
This consensus was extended during the recent meeting between Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), so that now high-ranking officials in the US administration, including Bush himself, will directly intervene at crucial points in the cross-strait relationship.
Zoellick bluntly pointed out that it is important for the US in its diplomatic policies to make sure that Taiwanese officials take responsibility for their promises, and that they must clarify any ambiguities. Clearly, Zoellick was referring to Chen's political promises: the "four noes and one not" (
Zoellick also pointed out that when certain Taiwanese politicians decide to renege on their promises by withdrawing from their original stance, or when they push the political envelope, the US government will respond with some kind of bilateral initiative, although without compromising its basic respect for Taiwan.
Zoellick's statement is strong for diplomatic language. The underlying meaning is that once Chen breaks a promise, the US will use its own way of putting heavy pressure on him and will not allow him to cross the US' line of tolerance.
Further, while Zoellick emphasized that Washington will suppress any moves toward Taiwan independence, Young also made plain his view that Washington is in favor of cross-strait direct links.
In his speech, Young said that the US is happy to see cross-strait economic and trade links being discussed through democratic means and transformed into policy. This is one of the least ambiguous statements to date of the US' stance on the issue of direct links.
Many people believe that the current stalemate between Taiwan and China on direct cross-strait links is in the US' best interest. This belief is in fact a myth. During her trip to Beijing in July 2004, then US national security advisor Condoleezza Rice reaffirmed the US' adherence to the "one-China" policy and urged the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to engage in genuine government-to-government dialogue.
Since former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) visits to China last year, the Bush administration has said that it welcomes dialogue, but that the Chinese leadership should also engage in direct dialogue with Taiwan's elected leaders.
Because the US has never made a clear public statement showing that it supports talks on direct cross-strait links, President Chen has procrastinated on this issue.
In his New Year's message, Chen even attempted to offer a policy of "active management and effective opening" and temporarily put the issue of direct links aside.
But given the contrast between the US welcome accorded KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in March and its refusal to grant President Chen a transit stop in New York, Chen has been forced to give Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) the task of formulating a new policy on cross-strait transportation links.
Zoellick's talk of independence meaning war is a warning to Taiwan not to take any rash action. Young's talk of the benefits of direct cross-strait links indicates that the legislative push to establish these links has US support. The government needs to listen to both messages.
Edward Chen is a professor in the Graduate Institute of American Studies at Tamkang University.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Lin Ya-ti
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and