Whether to allow direct cross-strait flights is an issue that impacts heavily on the prosperity of the public and the security of the nation. The possibility of the legislature amending the Statute Governing the Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (
To begin with, the economic downside of direct flights is a matter of grave concern. Many think that direct flights will further encourage capital outflows to China, pushing up domestic unemployment and increasing the country's reliance on the Chinese market -- all of which will strengthen China's position in relation to Taiwan.
Also, even if the establishment of direct flights is inevitable, the government should first put in place certain risk management measures. In addressing such a polarizing issue that is intimately tied to national interests, a mature democracy should seek to transcend partisan politics. Minority and majority parties must reach a consensus through cross-party negotiations; the ultimate decision should not simply be forced through by a majority in the legislature.
Allowing for direct flights entails air traffic control rights, ports of arrival and departure, quarantine and other issues that must be resolved via bilateral consultations. If the legislature were to suddenly open up cross-strait flights without the necessary preparations, Taiwan would lose much needed leverage in any negotiation with China, and the management of the nation's air and sea ports would be severely compromised.
Conducting negotiations on cross-strait flights falls within the president's jurisdiction and while the president must respect the opinion of the legislature, the final decision in this case is President Chen Shui-bian's (
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng's (
The truth is, delays in establishing cross-strait flights are mainly due to the fact that Beijing refuses to negotiate with Taiwan. Taiwan has already suggested the two sides introduce cross-strait cargo flights, but Beijing has refused to cooperate. Taiwan has revised the Statute Governing the Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, and is ready to apply the liaison model used earlier between Taiwan and Hong Kong, with private groups conducting the negotiations.
However, Beijing has insisted that Taiwan first accept the "1992 consensus" and the "one China principle" before entering into negotiations, which has deadlocked discussion. What the pan-blues and pan-greens should be doing at this stage is joining forces and exerting pressure on China together, not helping China to oppress their own government.
The New York-based Freedom House ranks Taiwan as Asia's most democratic country -- an evaluation that the Taiwanese people should be proud of. But vicious partisan squabbling is not the kind of democracy that we desire nor deserve.
The pan-blues and pan-greens must shed their prejudices for there to be any hope of improving the nation's current state of affairs. Otherwise, all of our successes as a democracy and market economy will slowly fade away.
Lin Wen-cheng is a professor in the Institute of Mainland China Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University, and is a member of the Taipei Society.
TRANSLATED BY MAX HIRSCH
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry