Nearly a year into the job, World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz has been wielding an anti-corruption sword that strikes the minute there's a whiff of shady dealings.
Chad, India, Kenya and Congo all have felt the sting of the cuts aimed at demonstrating how serious he is about fighting corruption.
Wolfowitz, who was the Pentagon's right hand man in justifying the 2003 invasion of Iraq, has provoked opposition among development organizations, who dismiss his actions as meaningless and arbitrary "saber rattling." Instead, they point the finger at the World Bank itself, which they say is responsible for a world culture of bribery.
At last month's joint spring meeting of the World Bank and IMF, worried member countries insisted that the World Bank set up standards and criteria to guarantee objectivity in such decisions. The guidelines are to be in place by the next meeting of the 184-member organization in Singapore in September.
Crackdown
Beginning in January, Wolfowitz signalled the new crackdown. In Chad, the bank pulled its co-financing of a US$4.1 billion African oil pipeline project because the government intended to use the oil income to fight alleged rebel groups, not poverty, as had been promised.
He blocked more than US$265 million in credit to Kenya after irregularities were uncovered. In India, US$1 billion for health projects were blocked. There will be no new funding for Uzbekistan for the time being.
After it came to light that the Congolese president partied away US$295,000 in a hotel in New York, paying the bill in cash, Wolfowitz put a hold on expected debt relief for the country.
Corruption is often the source of the problem when a government doesn't function, Wolfowitz said last month in Jakarta.
But the Bretton Woods Project, a watchdog of the World Bank and IMF, sees it differently. It says the roots of corruption are underpaid civil servants and the willingness of large companies to pay bribes, the group wrote. Salaries must often be reduced under reform programs that are prerequisites to receive credit from the World Bank.
Others agree.
"The World Bank should adopt an approach that starts looking at itself," said Lidy Nacpil of Jubilee South, a network of activist groups demanding dept cancelation based in the Philippines. "That's why we ask for a fully open audit of its activities."
Systemic problems
Wolfowitz "refuses to look at [the bank] itself about its role in perpetuating corruption through its lending conditionalities and corporate corruption," the group said.
Development groups accuse the World Bank of handing out contracts to large multinational companies instead of small local firms. The contract process must become more transparent, they say.
Parliaments should receive oversight for World Bank projects and civil rights groups should be more involved.
Wolfowitz has taken their concerns into account. The World Bank wants to publish a training program for civil servants, promote freedom of the press as a key ally in uncovering shady deals and consult more regularly with citizens groups.
The bank said last year 13 percent of its credit -- US$2.9 billion -- went to projects to improve government leadership through assistance in building systems based on the rule of law and the promotion of independent institutions.
Corruption police
The World Bank now has 50 corruption investigators who have investigated 1,700 suspected cases of irregularities in World Bank projects since the department was set up in 2001. The names of 330 companies and people have been banned from receiving new contracts and their names have been published on the World Bank Web site.
Smitu Kothari of the group Lokayan, which is fighting for democracy and equality in India, has been critical of the World Bank's anti-corruption campaign. He says the anti-corruption campaign is a new attempt to interfere in a country's affairs. The World Bank cannot act as a global policeman, he said, speaking in Washington.
Nevertheless, during the World Bank/IMF meeting Wolfowitz said he felt emboldened to continue the course.
"There is strong consensus among all shareholders that this is a problem that we need to address -- it's a problem for the poor people who are our biggest concern and it's a problem for the taxpayers of developed countries that help to pay our bills," he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry