We, the undersigned, strongly protest the ill-advised actions of the US Department of State in refusing Chen Shui-bian (
As a consequence, this refusal has endangered the president of Taiwan and relations with the US. The president could not accept the snub and thus changed his flight plan to Paraguay and Costa Rica.
This change forced President Chen, his entourage and the flight crew to fly for nearly 35 hours non-stop. When his route was later revealed, China used its influence to prevent Chen's plane from landing and refueling in Lebanon.
Taiwan became a true democracy in 1996. Since that time its people have freely elected their president, with Lee Teng-hui (
The refusal to allow Chen's plane to have a respectable transit stop in the US where he could disembark was not just a diplomatic snub. It was also a personal attack. The State Department spokesperson would only refer to President Chen with forms of the pronoun "he" and not his proper title of "president." Such actions are undiplomatic, spiteful and petty.
The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), enacted on April 10, 1979, when Taiwan was not a democracy, was established to maintain peace and security in the Western Pacific. As China increases the number of deployed missiles targeted at Taiwan -- currently over 800 -- the State Department rewards it with VIP treatment.
That same TRA states clearly in the very first paragraph that the US will act to "preserve and promote extensive, close and friendly commercial, cultural and other relations with Taiwan." Now that Taiwan has become the most promising democracy in Asia, it is all the more ironic that instead of promoting "extensive, close and friendly" relations with this democracy, the State Department treats it like a pariah.
For what reason has the State Department contradicted the express policy of the TRA and refused to treat Taiwan's president with respect? These US actions border on hypocrisy, insincerity and favoritism, particularly at this time when the US frequently accommodates and receives as guests the leaders of the dictatorial and autocratic one-party state of China, one of the greatest abusers of human rights in Asia and the world.
The opposition party in Taiwan, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), argues that the US is not a dependable partner, that Chen is not respected by the US government and that China would be a better partner for Taiwan.
The denial of transit rights is not just inept scheduling. It has much wider implications for the reputation of the US as a supporter of democratic governments and leaders.
US President George W. Bush's diplomatic goal is to maintain the status quo between Taiwan and China. But by humiliating Taiwan, the US unhinges the status quo from neutrality to a positive acceptance of China's policy of downgrading Taiwan's stature in international affairs.
The US is bending the status quo in favor of a China that claims it has the right to invade Taiwan if its government does not become "part" of China.
This is not the way to a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan-China problem. This is wrong, short-sighted and against the principles of democracy. Is there no shame?
Dr Jerome Keating, Richard Adler, Hanna Zaborska-Shen,
L.C. Russell Hsiao, Kiel Downey, Elaine Salt,
James Ascencio, Curtis Smith, Stuart Saunders, Kimberly Hsieh, Mark Miller, Emily Murray, Paul Cox, Jennifer Wen-jia Tsao, Taipei
Michael Turton, Dr William Stimson, Taichung
Dr Eugene Keh-chun Yang, Hsinchu
Dan Bloom, Chiayi
Dr Albert Tsai, Yardley, Pennsylvania
Dr Luby Liao, San Diego, California
Dr Richard Kagan, St. Paul, Minnesota
Dr Chen Ming-chung, Dr Michael Chen, Chicago
Mark Arnold, Atlanta, Georgia
John Guinane, San Jose, California
Dr Paul Shea, Irvine, California
Dr Stan Yang, Laguna Hills, California
Raymond Wu, Wencheng Lin, Los Angeles
Dr Runsun Pan, Houston, Texas
Dr Strong Chuang, United States
Malcolm Higgins, Warwickshire, England
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations