We, the undersigned, strongly protest the ill-advised actions of the US Department of State in refusing Chen Shui-bian (
As a consequence, this refusal has endangered the president of Taiwan and relations with the US. The president could not accept the snub and thus changed his flight plan to Paraguay and Costa Rica.
This change forced President Chen, his entourage and the flight crew to fly for nearly 35 hours non-stop. When his route was later revealed, China used its influence to prevent Chen's plane from landing and refueling in Lebanon.
Taiwan became a true democracy in 1996. Since that time its people have freely elected their president, with Lee Teng-hui (
The refusal to allow Chen's plane to have a respectable transit stop in the US where he could disembark was not just a diplomatic snub. It was also a personal attack. The State Department spokesperson would only refer to President Chen with forms of the pronoun "he" and not his proper title of "president." Such actions are undiplomatic, spiteful and petty.
The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), enacted on April 10, 1979, when Taiwan was not a democracy, was established to maintain peace and security in the Western Pacific. As China increases the number of deployed missiles targeted at Taiwan -- currently over 800 -- the State Department rewards it with VIP treatment.
That same TRA states clearly in the very first paragraph that the US will act to "preserve and promote extensive, close and friendly commercial, cultural and other relations with Taiwan." Now that Taiwan has become the most promising democracy in Asia, it is all the more ironic that instead of promoting "extensive, close and friendly" relations with this democracy, the State Department treats it like a pariah.
For what reason has the State Department contradicted the express policy of the TRA and refused to treat Taiwan's president with respect? These US actions border on hypocrisy, insincerity and favoritism, particularly at this time when the US frequently accommodates and receives as guests the leaders of the dictatorial and autocratic one-party state of China, one of the greatest abusers of human rights in Asia and the world.
The opposition party in Taiwan, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), argues that the US is not a dependable partner, that Chen is not respected by the US government and that China would be a better partner for Taiwan.
The denial of transit rights is not just inept scheduling. It has much wider implications for the reputation of the US as a supporter of democratic governments and leaders.
US President George W. Bush's diplomatic goal is to maintain the status quo between Taiwan and China. But by humiliating Taiwan, the US unhinges the status quo from neutrality to a positive acceptance of China's policy of downgrading Taiwan's stature in international affairs.
The US is bending the status quo in favor of a China that claims it has the right to invade Taiwan if its government does not become "part" of China.
This is not the way to a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan-China problem. This is wrong, short-sighted and against the principles of democracy. Is there no shame?
Dr Jerome Keating, Richard Adler, Hanna Zaborska-Shen,
L.C. Russell Hsiao, Kiel Downey, Elaine Salt,
James Ascencio, Curtis Smith, Stuart Saunders, Kimberly Hsieh, Mark Miller, Emily Murray, Paul Cox, Jennifer Wen-jia Tsao, Taipei
Michael Turton, Dr William Stimson, Taichung
Dr Eugene Keh-chun Yang, Hsinchu
Dan Bloom, Chiayi
Dr Albert Tsai, Yardley, Pennsylvania
Dr Luby Liao, San Diego, California
Dr Richard Kagan, St. Paul, Minnesota
Dr Chen Ming-chung, Dr Michael Chen, Chicago
Mark Arnold, Atlanta, Georgia
John Guinane, San Jose, California
Dr Paul Shea, Irvine, California
Dr Stan Yang, Laguna Hills, California
Raymond Wu, Wencheng Lin, Los Angeles
Dr Runsun Pan, Houston, Texas
Dr Strong Chuang, United States
Malcolm Higgins, Warwickshire, England
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry