Next time when you see your child having a daydream or playing a game of make-believe, don't chastise him or distract him from it because he is using this time to develop his imagination and creativity. This kind of behavior will not only help him to accelerate his thinking, but also strengthen his confidence to solve unexpected problems and deal with life.
Albert Einstein once said that imagination was more important than knowledge. Indeed, our imagination unties us from the past and the real world, and allows us to contemplate the future and an alternative reality.
I can testify to this. We are an ordinary family living in Taipei. Our two children never went to cram schools. They studied at public schools: Long An Elementary School, Chin Hwa Junior High School, Zhongzheng and Nan Gang Senior High School.
Every year they enjoyed their spring and summer vacations by playing games with friends, swimming, reading stories or acting in self-created dramas. All these non-utilitarian activities allowed them to develop active and inquiring minds. In addition, we had meals at home and ate together in order to communicate, exchange knowledge and learn from each other.
The result has been positive. Right now both children are studying in their preferred faculties at national universities. They aren't perfect kids, but they have very strong personalities and know very well how to enjoy life. I'm very grateful to their teachers and I don't ever regret the decision my husband and I made to trust our children and let them take responsibility for their lives.
Unfortunately, many parents are obsessed with their children's success. They deny their kids the opportunity to dream and develop their imaginations. They keep them as busy as slaves. Just have a look at their schedules after school and you will realize how overworked they are. They spend all their free time on studying at cram schools or at home with tutors.
The summer vacations are planned to participate in all kinds of camps in order to reinforce skills and knowledge. One example I have heard of is the "Leadership Camp." This kind of thing sends shivers down my spine and reminds me of Hitler's Napola, the famous schools for the Nazi elite.
Parents are obsessed with such educational activities due to the loss of our "spaces of imagination." The city environment, in turn, is responsible for this loss. I'm sure you've heard about OmniAd Media, the new neon god whose flat-panel screens and billboards proliferate in Taipei buses and MRT stations. Its advertisements bombard the public with noise and visual pollution.
According to its own name "Omnia" -- Latin for "all the things" -- the goal is to invade every vacant space to force-feed us with commercial information.
Unfortunately many parents don't realize the importance of spaces of imagination. They don't resist the Omnia invasion and have been gradually deprived of their right to live in a quiet environment, which is the physical and conceptual space of imaginative mind.
In a word, we parents must make the right choice, to allow our children to become like battery chickens or content, free-range hens. If we want our kids to become free-range students, we must be very determined to resist the global trend toward commercialization, especially in big cities.
We must fight to keep our spaces of imagination, not only physical spaces, such as spaces in our home, neighborhood or on the MRT, but also emotional spaces, those places that emerge through conversations with our children, when laughing, singing, or dancing with them.
At the same time we must help our children to have a lifestyle equilibrium and prevent them from becoming addicted to the "screens" that invade out lives. We must also take a break once in a while, to sit down, close our eyes and try to rediscover our own ability to dream. When doing this, we will understand not to alienate our children by denying them the right to be idle.
Sylvie Allassonniere
Neihu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with