Last year, China passed its intimidating "Anti-Secession" Law and put further pressure on Taiwan through Washington. But it has also been offering unilateral preferential treatment and mutual cooperation benefits in order to win over some Taiwanese and so divide Taiwan. China is applying more and more resources to back up its Taiwan policy, which is becoming increasingly targeted.
How should the Taiwanese government deal with this situation? Like China, it should also adopt a two-pronged strategy, mixing a soft and tough approach.
As far as the hard approach is concerned, Taiwan should use the shared values and a consensus reached within Taiwan as a basis for cross-strait exchanges, and seek the support of the Chinese people and the global community.
First, Taiwan should build a domestic consensus concerning sovereignty, democracy and public opinion. Faced with mounting pressure from China, the governing and opposition parties should build a broader consensus rather than accentuating differences. This would prevent China from dividing or weakening Taiwan. This is a mission for the governing party and also a responsibility that the opposition parties must shoulder.
Taiwan should also seek potential allies within China to promote lasting cross-strait lasting peace and genuine friendship, rather than treating all Chinese and government officials as enemies. Moreover, the government should also make an effort to deepen relations with the international community.
Over the past few years, China has been constantly stressing its peaceful development. However, without democracy and freedom, China is unlikely to allow for real peace and sustainable development in the Asia Pacific region.
An undemocratic and closed political, economic and military colossus such as China makes the whole world suspicious of its intentions. An authoritarian China poses a challenge to the democratic community in the Asia-Pacific region and is a ticking time-bomb that threatens regional peace and prosperity. Therefore, it is the unshirkable responsibility of all nations in the Asia Pacific to help lead China toward a democratic, peaceful and prosperous rising.
Taiwan can play a key role in helping China pursue sustainable development, respect human rights and freedoms and march toward democracy. Specifically, Taiwan could set up US$1 million awards to promote Chinese democracy and human rights, in order to commend anyone around the world -- be they Chinese, Taiwanese or others -- who has made a contribution to improving conditions in China. Both individuals and institutions should be eligible. Certainly, Chinese national leaders, government officials or any non-governmental organizations should also be eligible.
Second, Taiwan should seek to organize an annual forum for Chinese people from around the world to discuss China's democratization and its violations of human rights. Third, the Taiwanese government could offer honorary citizenship and residency rights to those who have made special contributions to China's democracy, human rights and freedom, including Chinese people and overseas Chinese. Fourth, Taiwan should issue an annual report on the progress of China's human rights conditions and democratization.
As far as the soft approach is concerned, Taiwan must take the initiative in order to improve its disadvantaged position on the cross-strait political chessboard. The Taiwanese government should also take the initiative in studying the China-related benefits for the Taiwanese people, stress that it would like to engage in negotiations with China through a third party and establish a mutual framework for dealing with cross-strait trade and other issues.
The government should take a more flexible approach in protecting and expanding the welfare of Taiwanese in China.
The cross-strait political deadlock cannot be solved overnight. However, cross-strait exchanges will continue to deepen and expand. The Taiwanese government must face up to this.
If Taiwan continues to demand that China acknowledge Taiwan's sovereignty as a precondition for cross-strait exchanges and negotiations, the political deadlock will persist, allowing the Chinese government more opportunities to win over the Taiwanese people.
Adopting a more flexible approach in dealing with cross-strait trade negotiations does not mean that Taiwan must accept China's stance. In fact, only by following the trend toward more deregulated cross-strait trade can the Taiwanese government quell people's doubts and reduce the pressure of having to make political concessions to Beijing.
Tung Chen-yuan is an assistant professor in the Sun Yat-sen Graduate Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under