The king of Nepal's refusal to release his firm grip on power has helped unite a fractious opposition and threatened his survival as exalted head of the country, analysts said.
King Gyanendra faces weeks of continued pressure after he gave some ground last Friday by offering to return power to the people -- but was dramatically rejected by some 300,000 Nepalese who took to the streets.
Political scientist S.M. Habibullah, of Kathmandu's Tribhuwan University, said Nepal was just "at the beginning" of a protest movement to try to shift power from the monarch to the politicians.
Gyanendra on Friday asked the seven-party opposition alliance to choose a prime minister but politicians refused as he still retained the power to sack political leaders and take outright control of the country.
"The hub of politics is not outside the palace," Habibullah said. "The political parties have already said: we're not ready to take the gift [accept the offer] of the king."
The opposition have stepped up their demands for the reinstatement of parliament, suspended by Gyanendra in 2002, and the creation of a constituent assembly to decide the future of the monarchy.
"If he goes for the constituent assembly that's going to be the end of the monarch" in his current guise, said one diplomatic source.
But if the protests continue "it will take him a while to get to the stage where he realizes he has absolutely no choice," the source said.
Gyanendra may seek to drive a wedge between the Maoists and the seven-party alliance that is promoting a general strike that has virtually paralyzed the Himalayan kingdom since Nov. 6, analysts said.
The Maoists, who have fought a bloody 10-year insurgency that has left more than 12,500 dead, struck a loose deal with the opposition last November. The politicians agreed to the key Maoist demand for a referendum on the constitution while the rebels agreed to cooperate with the parties.
The seven-party alliance has stuck even though the parties range from the hard left to others who want the king to retain a ceremonial role under any new system.
It has also survived a clampdown during this month by Gyanendra that has seen more than a dozen killed, hundreds wounded and even more arrested.
"The kind of repression that has taken place has united the political parties," South Asian analyst Sukh Deo Muni said.
Analysts said the king could try to exploit the often tempestuous relationships between the alliance to weaken their campaign.
Even while running the country before Gyanendra seized total control in February last year, Nepal was marked by inter-party feuding and political deadlock.
"The king may try to disintegrate the seven-party alliance," said Mahendra Lama, professor of South Asian Studies at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University.
"The king will try to play the parties against the Maoists. It will be a very, very untenable position," Lama said.
"If the king becomes obstinate, people may look for the demise of this institution," he said, even though the monarch is traditionally revered as the incarnation of the God Vishnu, the protector.
"The writing is clearly on the wall. If the king remains obstinate this could very well be the case," Lama said.
There were early signs of the tactic of division in the editorial of Sunday's state-run newspaper, the Rising Nepal, which warned of a "historic blunder" if the opposition parties failed to agree on the formation of a new government.
"Should the political parties fail to listen to the grievances of the people and let anarchy and chaos prevail in the country again, it will compound the problems," it said.
The opposition has declared economic war on Gyanendra urging citizens to stop paying taxes, utility bills and asked Nepalese living overseas to stop sending money home.
The Asian Human Rights Commission said Gyanendra had no legitimacy as monarch "as he is a coup leader" who overthrew the government.
"His ouster can only be seen as a just resolution of the coup," said the Hong Kong-based group. "Moments for decisive change appear very rarely. Such a moment is now upon Nepal."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.