When US President George W. Bush met Chinese President Hu Jintao (
At that time, when asked about a referendum that was planned to coincide with Taiwan's presidential election on March 20, 2004, Bush recounted what he told Wen on the issue: "We oppose any unilateral decision by either China or Taiwan to change the status quo. And the comments and actions made by the leader of Taiwan indicate that he may be willing to make decisions unilaterally to change the status quo, which we oppose." If that was not damaging enough, then listen to what Wen had to say: "We appreciate the position of the US government."
A senior Bush administration official tried to play down the incident afterwards by claiming that Bush had also told his visitor that the US "would have to get involved if China tried to use coercion or force to unilaterally change the status quo."
Nevertheless, Beijing emerged as the winner as it had succeeded in pushing Washington to rein in Taipei.
China used to insist that the Taiwan issue was an internal affair and the outside world, especially the US, should mind its own business. Now China relies on the US stick to deal with Taiwan.
The US should make substantial efforts to oppose Taiwanese independence and not send any wrong signal to "Taiwan's secessionists," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao (
"I hope the United States can make joint efforts with us in safeguarding China-US relations and the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait," he added.
According to the New York Times, China views the NUC episode as a test of how well the US could constrain Chen. And China believes that Chen has prevailed over Washington's objections.
The clearest signal that China may be seeking stronger action from the US came from Li Zhaoxing (李肇星), China's foreign minister. Speaking at a news conference last month, Li warned the US against sending "false signals" to Taiwan by playing down the scrapping of the NUC, which he called "a dangerous step toward independence" that required a tough response not only from China but also from other governments.
Indeed, as Hu's visit approached, there were lots of signals indicating that China expected Bush to offer public comments and private reassurances to discourage Chen from pushing any further.
For example, two senior US experts in the Chinese government, in separate interviews last week, indicated how obsessive China is regarding Taiwan. Both Yang Jiechi (楊潔箎), vice foreign minister and former ambassador to Washington, and Zhou Wenzhong (周文重), the current ambassador, said that Taiwan remains the most important and sensitive issue in US-China relations.
Yang called on the US "to work together with China to oppose and counter secessionist activities on the part of Taiwan," while Zhou said the Taiwan issue is "crucial to maintaining steady development of bilateral relations."
In fact, Bush himself is aware of the Chinese obsession. Speaking at Johns Hopkins' school of advanced international studies last week, he said that Taiwan has always been a "predominant issue," on China's agenda.
And Adam Ereli, the State Department's deputy spokesman, has already told reporters that the US would make its position on Taiwan clear when the two leaders meet.
It will be interesting to see what Bush will say at the summit. Taiwan seems to be bracing itself for the worst. David Lee (
Taiwanese-American organizations plan to protest in Lafayette Park while Hu is inside the White House next door. Organizers expect several thousand people to join the protests.
When the US President receives the Chinese dictator at the White House, Bush should indeed repeat something he has said before. Last November, during a visit to Japan, Bush praised Taiwan's journey from repression to democracy.
Bush probably uttered the highest compliment to Taiwan ever by any US president in living memory: "Taiwan is free and democratic and prosperous. By embracing freedom at all levels, Taiwan has delivered prosperity to its people and crated a free and democratic Chinese society."
Bush should repeat his Kyoto speech to Hu and not repeat the mistake he made two years ago.
Liu Kin-ming is a Washington-based columnist.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations