The meeting between US President George W. Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Hu has two main goals for his visit to the US. The first is to be treated as the leader of a major nation, to enhance his status in China. Secondly, he wants the US to rein in independence advocates in Taiwan and criticize President Chen Shui-bian's (
The US, however, sees things differently. Bush said in a speech a few days ago that he would be broaching three major issues with Hu: fair trade, human rights and religious freedom.
Bush said he is aware of the importance Beijing places on the Taiwan issue, but reiterated that the US' position has not changed: the US does not wish to see either side making any changes to the "status quo" across the Taiwan Strait. The last time Hu met Bush in New York, the US president didn't even mention Taiwan. Beijing is likely to be disappointed again.
Of the three issues the US wishes to bring up, the most important is probably that of trade. The Democrats are getting antsy that the Sino-US trade deficit hit a historic high of US$200 billion last year. This is an especially touchy topic this year with the up-and-coming midterm elections. Bush is looking to maintain the Republican majority in the Senate and House of Representatives and cannot afford to make any concessions to Beijing on the trade front.
In a speech given at Johns Hopkins University last week, Bush openly challenged Hu, saying that the Chinese president would be visiting a nation with which his country is running an annual trade deficit of more than US$200 billion. Many Americans were wondering what had happened to the idea of fair trade, Bush said.
For his part, Hu does not dare offer compromises on trade either, as Beijing is concerned that allowing the yuan to fluctuate against the greenback would have serious consequences for the economy -- not good for a dictatorial government that puts stability first. Beijing, then, is making smaller concessions in an attempt to quell US anger -- such as a recent trade mission to the US which purchased US$16 billion in goods, promised to combat piracy, lifted the ban on US beef imports and opened up the telecommunications and medical equipment markets.
The fundamental reasons why this meeting will yield little of substance are the completely different social and political systems of the two countries and the differing values of their leaders. According to China specialists speaking at a conference sponsored by the Heritage Foundation, the US government is losing faith in Hu, whom they originally saw as a reformer but have come to think of as one of the old guard.
The US public, too, have a negative opinion of communist China. A recent public survey by the Rand Corporation, a US think tank, reveals that 64 percent of Americans see China as an economic threat to the US, 50 percent believe China poses a military threat to the US, and 55 percent think China employs unfair competition in the global market.
There are three major reasons why Americans see Beijing in a bad light: its dictatorial political system, its military intimidation of Taiwan and its unfair trade policy with the US. Until these basic factors are dealt with, Sino-US relations will remain full of uncertainty.
Cao Changqing is a freelance journalist.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs