Are you U or non-U? By which I mean, are you a universalist or a relativist? Forget left and right; the defining political divide of the global era is between those who believe that some moral rights and freedoms ought to be universal and those who argue that each culture to its own. This new frontline of contemporary debate runs across issues as diverse as race, faith, multiculturalism, feminism, gay rights, freedom of speech and foreign policy. In each instance, the argument eventually comes down to whether you have a universalist or relativist view of the world.
Universalists argue that certain rights and protections -- freedom of speech, democracy, the rule of law -- are common or, at least, should be available to all people. Relativists maintain that different cultures have different values and that it's impossible to say that one system or idea is better than another and, moreover, it's racist to try.
If all of that sounds a little abstract and theoretical, then a quick glance at government policy is enough to show that these contradictory principles underpin many of the most significant developments of recent years. For example, the interventions in Kosovo, Sierra Leone and, most controversially, Iraq were predicated, give or take a few WMD, on the notion that the inhabitants of those countries should be extended the democratic rights that most people in the West take for granted.
At the same time on the domestic front, a lot of time and effort has been devoted to instituting what Nobel economist Amartya Sen calls "plural monoculturalism," which is to say the maintenance of ethnic and cultural separateness through the encouragement of faith schools, "community leaders" and identity politics.
Thus, you could say that the government was universalist abroad and relativist at home. If all that's a little confusing, then perhaps it's time to check whether you are U or non-U. I have designed a test that is every bit as relevant to modern manners as Nancy Mitford's book on class published 50 years ago.
Let's start with cannibalism, slavery and ritual human sacrifice.
Do you think that they are:
a) utterly unspeakable acts of barbarity?
b) vibrant expressions of a distinctive cultural heritage?
Actually, that was a fairly easy one -- even the most postmodern relativist tends to choke on cannibalism. Here's something a little more difficult.
What's your feeling about clitoridectomy and the stoning to death of women adulterers?
a) misogynistic;
b) that's a racist question;
c) empowering.
How about empirical reason?
a) the very basis of scientific advance;
b) overrated;
c) not as reliable as tarot cards.
What's your take on the Enlightenment?
a) it was a historical shift towards universal human rights and freedoms;
b) a Western fiction that never happened and, if it did happen, it led directly to Hitler;
c) only God is light.
Freedom of speech?
a) is the basis of all other freedoms;
b) you support it but only if you agree with what's being said and there's no such thing as complete freedom of speech, anyway, so what's wrong with even less?
c) shut up or I'll cut your head off.
What do you think of secularism?
a) the only system that protects all faiths equally without allowing any to dominate;
b) Iraq was secular and look what happened to it;
c) a disgusting insult to the will of God.
Indefinite detention without trial?
a) never acceptable;
b) not acceptable when the US does it;
c) acceptable if the hostages are Westerners.
Should individuals be able to do what they want, as long as it doesn't harm anyone else?
a) yes;
b) people don't know what they want, they've been brainwashed by the corporate media;
c) everything that is godless is harmful.
Are all cultures equal?
a) no, they sanction varying degrees of freedom, equality, opportunity, security and diversity;
b) no, Western democracy is by far the worst;
c) no, the Jews have all the power.
Gay rights?
a) homosexuals should enjoy the same rights and freedoms as heterosexuals;
b) gay rights should not be a shibboleth that prevent politically expedient alliances with reactionary homophobes;
c) they have the right to be thrown off roofs and crushed under walls.
OK, let's total up your score. If you got six or more As, you are a U, an unapologetic universalist; say after me, there is no race but the human race. If you got six or more Bs, you are non-U, have you thought about joining the Respect party? If you got six or more Cs -- U, non-U, what a load of decadent nonsense -- you know the Truth.
The good thing about this test is that no one is right and no one is wrong, there are no winners and no losers. It's universal fun, relatively speaking.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and