Tomorrow the Council of Agriculture is expected to announce its formal rejection of two zoo operators' applications for the importation of pandas from China. Criticism from within Taiwan (primarily by the pan-blue camp) and from without (primarily Chinese officials) over the decision immediately followed the meeting of the council's Forestry Bureau on Friday. Critics decry the supposedly political nature of the decision. However, they seem to ignore that China's motives in offering the pandas were always political, and brazenly so. One can hardly blame a government for reciprocating with a political decision.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma, as mayor of Taipei, is no doubt also unhappy because Taipei Zoo was one of the rejected applicants. Echoing the Chinese media, Ma and other critics of the government's decision complained that political interests should not intrude on gift-giving. But one should never look at such government decisions in isolation. Instead, they should be examined in the context of the entire cross-strait relationship. Only then can one recognize that the gesture was never anything more than an act of propaganda, and an admittedly effective one at that.
Through the simple act of giving two pandas, Beijing was trying to create the impression that China means no harm to Taiwan.
But there is barely a reason to believe in the existence of Chinese goodwill toward Taiwan against the backdrop of hundreds of Chinese missiles pointed this way, the repeated efforts by Beijing to keep Taiwan out of the World Health Organization, and the passage of the "Anti-Secession" Law, with possible revisions that will crack down on the very act of expressing support for this nation's democracy and self-determination.
Under the circumstances, what could the government do? It could have accepted the pandas (ignoring the prison lifestyles that they would have had to endure), but this would have rewarded China for its cynicism and diverted public attention from the growing danger that Taiwan faces.
If accepting the pandas had led Beijing to respect this place or had at least prompted the removal of missiles, then maybe it would have been justifiable. But this was never going to happen, and everybody knows it.
Those desperate for their "cute" fix can consider saving up to visit China's interior where pandas belong, or, better still, patronize the Taipei Zoo's native fauna exhibit, which includes an interesting range of creatures, including the magnificent -- and no less cute, if you don't get too close -- Formosan black bear.
The pandas are now a non-issue. Fully grown adults could do worse than move on and concern themselves with matters of substance.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under