Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
The manner of language Wen will use is just as predictable. Here's a sample: In an interview in Thursday's edition of the Australian newspaper with its editor-in-chief and China correspondent, Wen imperiously greeted his guests with cliched selections from the Analects as if educated Australians had never heard of Confucius. His guests, of course, were too polite to reply with a lesser known Confucian query, such as: "In practicing government, sir, why should you kill?" (
If there is one thing that is more troubling than autocrats appealing to Confucian wisdom, it is the near silence that reigns in Australia over the propriety of the uranium deal. Nobody with seeming influence is asking how a regime that presides over massive desecration of the countryside, lies about environmental mishaps and punishes whistleblowers can be trusted to manage not only the operations of nuclear reactors in the long term but also guard the vast amounts of radioactive waste that must be stored securely for an eternity. And that's not considering the possibility of uranium transfer to China's nuclear weapons program or the terrorist threat.
Federation for a Democratic China (Australian division) head Chin Jin (
Unlike the US, where for strategic and philosophical reasons there is a reliable and vocal core of sentiment backing Taiwan against Chinese aggression, the Australian establishment has no substantial pro-Taiwan lobby to balance excesses spawned by lip-smacking over a "rising China." Still, it would be encouraging to see Howard and his foreign minister seize the opportunity to publicly warn China against any cross-strait act of aggression. But Howard knows it is not his place to lecture a Son of the Dragon: The consequences of impertinence would be too great, as with vassal states of old.
The conclusion of this uranium deal coincides deliciously not only with an Australian senate report expressing concern over China's military, but also the summoning to the Cole inquiry of Australia's trade and defense ministers over what they really know about bribery in the sale of Australian wheat to former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's government. The irony of this seems to have escaped most commentators, but from a Taiwanese point of view, the Australian government's documented ineptitude -- if not outright corruption -- in its dealings with a vicious autocracy does not bode well.
Until the time comes that Canberra stands up and unequivocally supports Taiwan's democracy against any form of Chinese violence, its actions in relation to China on key matters such as uranium sales and military contacts -- however they are intended -- can only be regarded as hostile.
As for that heroic but pathetic breed of Chinese known as the "democrat" -- who is hoping against hope for a committed advocacy of human rights -- Australia's easy embrace of an autocratic agenda can only serve to further discourage and bewilder.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry