The March 23 suicide of Lee Shuang-chuan (李雙全), suspected of sabotage in connection with the March 17 train derailment on the Southern Link Line, generated another wave of public debate about the incident.
Some people think Lee was hounded to death by the media -- which published details of the investigation -- while others believe that the real culprits are the prosecutors and insurance companies. As a result, the case continues to command public interest and has become a hot topic in the media. The problem is that while most of these theories lack concrete evidence, it seems everyone wants to be a Sherlock Holmes and continue to make comments and express opinions about the case. This state of affairs continues to confuse the public's understanding of the development of the case.
From the perspective of forensic science, every single statement must be supported by a corresponding piece of evidence. Press reports, the criminal justice system, as well as people involved in the case and their families, base their responses on "reasonable suspicion" and hearsay evidence, and even offer further "unreasonable" interpretations on this basis.
For example, when prosecutors say that there is "reasonable suspicion," they imply to the general public that they may be holding concrete evidence of some kind. As a result, the operations of the criminal justice system as a whole, media reporting, the attitudes of the insurance companies, and the reactions of the general public in the wake of the incident highlight the lack of understanding of basic forensic science concepts and common sense in Taiwan.
In fact, not only is there a difference between"reasonable suspicion" and "concrete evidence," but there is a vast distance. Investigators might think that they are simply airing reasonable doubt, but once that information reaches the general public, it is often distorted or interpreted as concrete evidence.
This is the reason for misunderstandings arising from many closed investigations, and it may be a result of investigators lacking experience in dealing with the media or lacking common sense about forensics. In this regard, maybe we have something to learn from Taiwanese-American forensics expert Henry Lee (李昌鈺).
The main reason why Lee is internationally well-known can be traced back to his truth-seeking and fact-finding scientific spirit and never venturing outside the scope of science in his interpretation of evidence. Lee's remarks in media interviews regarding the investigation of the March 19, 2004, shooting of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) show that he only says things based on the forensic evidence on hand.
As to the questions on issues where evidence is insufficient, he always shows restraint by saying that it is beyond the scope of his expertise. This keeps reasonable doubt from getting mixed up with concrete evidence.
In order to strictly follow the "closed investigation" principle, investigators should refrain from publicizing information about their ongoing investigations to avoid confusion or misinterpretations.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor at the department of political science and the Graduate Institute of Political Economy at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.