When the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) announces plans for new regulations to limit the number of hours that foreign English teachers may teach to 32 per week ("CLA to limit English teachers' hours," March 18, page 1), one wonders what its ultimate goals really are.
Chou Ting-an (周丁安), chief of research and planning at the council's Vocational Training and Employment Department, did not cite any research showing that there has been a decline in English teaching quality or that over-worked, exploited foreign English teachers are responsible for the problem -- if it does exist. Nor does Chou explain why foreign English teachers should be singled out when most English instruction in Taiwan is carried out by Taiwanese school teachers. Nor does he give any rationale for excluding teachers of other languages. All he does is make an unsupported prediction that, "If there are no restrictions, the employers will increase the hours indefinitely and affect the overall quality of the teaching."
The reader is left guessing why Chou doesn't trust public school principals or bushibanbosses to make their own decisions regarding the quality of instruction that goes on in their institutions. Or for that matter, why Chou is trying to steal the Ministry of Education's thunder. A decline in the quality of teaching is properly their concern, isn't it?
Are there masses of over-worked, foreign English teachers bitching about too many classroom hours on the Internet? I think not. Sure, bitching goes on, but too many classroom hours is not an issue. There are too many other ways in which foreign English teachers are screwed.
I am not convinced that the Council of Labor Affairs wants to better our lot, but if it does, it ought to first find out what the problem areas are.
Bruce Franklin
Taipei
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry