As it struggles to form a government for the Palestinian territories, Hamas seems to be clutching to the Biblical verses in Ecclesiastes rather than the desires of the Quartet (the US, Russia, the EU and the UN) charged with trying to bridge the Israeli-Palestinian divide.
"To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven," fits Hamas' current agenda because its priorities and time frame are different from those of the international community, which is pressing it to make immediate political declarations, most importantly, to recognize Israel's right to exist.
Hamas understands the political obligations that it must meet in order to be accepted in the world community, but its leaders prefer to wait until they are fully empowered before exploring these issues. Moreover, Hamas, like most Palestinians, is trying to evaluate the best way forward in the peace process. In their eyes, the current process produced years of inaction in negotiations, allowing for continued occupation and theft of Palestinian lands.
As an example, Hamas leaders point out that in the past year, with the moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in power, the Israelis have not even negotiated with him. So, from their point of view, Israel is not going to rush to negotiate with any Palestinian authority, whether it recognizes Israel's right to exist or not.
Instead, Hamas leaders are preoccupied with basic issues like preserving internal unity among Palestinians, ending lawlessness, ensuring greater respect for the rule of law, fighting corruption and reforming Palestinian governance. Most Palestinians are in complete agreement with these priorities.
Indeed, the latest public opinion poll among Palestinians shows that 73 percent feel as secure as or even more secure than they did before the election. Of the 709 randomly selected Palestinians who were surveyed, 30 percent said that they hope the new Hamas government tackles corruption. Twenty-two percent said that they hope Ismael Haniyeh, Hamas' designated prime minister, will end the chaos in towns and provide internal security and the rule of law. Almost one in five hoped that unemployment would be addressed.
Ironically, while the majority of Palestinians voted a religious movement into power, only 1 percent of those polled said that Hamas' priority should be to implement Islamic law.
While the poll showed that an overwhelming 73 percent of Palestinians still support a peace deal with Israel, they are not confident that a deal is around the corner. Eleven percent of the respondents said that the prisoner issue should be the most important priority for the new government -- nearly twice the number who said that a peace settlement with Israel should be the top priority. More than 8,000 Palestinians are held in Israeli prisons, many without charge or trial. Nevertheless, 62 percent of respondents said that they believe Hamas should change its position regarding recognition of Israel.
It is difficult for an international superpower like the US or a regional one like Israel to realize that a group or a people dare to have priorities different from theirs. But Palestinians have shown over the years that they are a proud people who will not cave in just because the other side is militarily or politically more powerful.
In any case, Hamas cannot be blamed for using the US' push for democracy to attain popular goals. After all, anyone who wants to be re-elected must give priority to the needs of their own people and not necessarily to the demands of the international community. Only when elected representatives deal with the day-to-day issues that face their people can they begin to tackle external negotiations.
What is clear is that Hamas and the Palestinians want an end to the 38-year Israeli occupation, and that selling Palestinians the same plans that were sold to the Palestine Liberation Organization will not work. If Israel and the international community are genuinely serious about ending the occupation, Hamas will cooperate.
While Hamas must be flexible in dealing with legitimate requests by the international community, the worldcommunity is obliged to provide an effective road map to peace. Once Palestinians are convinced that there is an opportunity for genuine peace and independence, they will press Hamas to act on it -- or elect a party that will.
Clearly, the international community has lacked the political will to press Israel to change. For the time being, and until this will is found, the world should give Hamas time to deal with the daily needs of Palestinians. Once the possibility of serious negotiations appears, a Hamas that has improved the lives of ordinary Palestinians will be in a position to carry out the negotiations that will be needed for a historic compromise.
Daoud Kuttab is director of the Institute of Modern Media at Al Quds University in Ramallah.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry