The Bush administration reaffirmed its right on Thursday to use pre-emptive military action against potential threats, but signalled a new emphasis on forging alliances to take collective action against terrorism and the proliferation of nuclear arms and to promote democracy.
In a newly adjusted doctrine, laid out in the first National Security Strategy (NSS) document since the Iraq war, the administration reflected a note of caution after three years fighting in Iraq. According to one Democratic foreign policy expert it signified that the "Bush revolution is officially over."
Laying out the strategic underpinning of US foreign policy, the NSS stated: "We may face no greater challenge from a single country than from Iran." It emphasized the primacy of diplomacy in attempting to prevent Iran acquiring nuclear weapons. But without directly mentioning military action, it also warned that "this diplomatic effort must succeed if confrontation is to be avoided."
Iran offered to open talks with the US on Iraq on Thursday, and National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley said: "We are prepared to have a conversation with Iran" to discuss what the US describes as Iranian covert action to destabilize Iraq.
Meanwhile, Washington is seeking a UN Security Council rebuke to Iran, as a possible step towards further international sanctions, but the Bush administration has refused to rule out military action if that is the only way of stopping Tehran becoming a nuclear power.
Presenting the NSS paper on Thursday, Hadley said it "affirms that the doctrine of pre-emption remains sound and must remain an integral part of our national security strategy". That doctrine was laid out in the last NSS in 2002, but many critics have argued it has been called into question by the Iraq invasion, justified by inaccurate intelligence on alleged weapons of mass destruction.
However, the new 49-page doctrinal statement said: "We do not rule out the use of force before attacks occur, even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack."
At the same time, the new NSS document puts far more emphasis than its predecessor on diplomacy and concerted international action.
It echoes the principal theme of US President George W. Bush's second inaugural address in January last year: the need to promote democracy around the world as the best long-term means of defeating terrorism and assuring US security.
"With the publication of its new National Security Strategy, the Bush Revolution is officially over," declared Ivo Daalder, a former senior official in the Clinton administration's national security council, in a blog response to the NSS. "In some notable ways, the new strategy document represents a return to the foreign policy of Bill Clinton."
"The interesting question is why the Bush administration has decided to reverse course. Part of the answer, surely, lies in the fact that reality demonstrated the limits of its revolutionary foreign policy," Daalder wrote.
A renewed emphasis on the need for international partnerships was also a feature of the Quadrennial Defense Review, a long-term strategy document published by the Pentagon earlier this year.
Like that defense policy review, the NSS stressed the importance of finding new friends abroad and training them to combat terrorist groups themselves.
It defines the "first pillar" of US foreign policy as "promoting freedom, justice, and human dignity", and the "second pillar" as "confronting the challenges of our time by leading a growing community of democracies".
The US, the document said, would put more energy into mobilizing democracies to put pressure on dictatorships, such as North Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Belarus, Myanmar and Zimbabwe.
"Though tyranny has few advocates, it needs more adversaries. In today's world no tyrant's rule can survive without the support or at least the tolerance of other nations," the policy paper said.
In 2002 Bush listed Iran and North Korea as co-equal members of the "axis of evil", alongside Iraq. The new document clearly portrays Iran as the primary threat.
Thursday's overture by Iran, announced by the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Ali Larijani, was widely seen as a bid to relieve some of the international pressure on the country over its nuclear program.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and