In recent years, the release of "information" by our legislators, officials or even the president has become a trend. These people seldom have clear and definite evidence to back up their revelations, but despite this, we rarely see their parties intervene, and their behavior is excused as being "personal" in nature.
In Japan, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi recently went through the final general budget review of his term of office. The opposition Democratic Party was ready for a big fight. But the exposure of a groundless e-mail accusation against the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) ruined the Democratic Party's image and caused chaos, while the budget was given easy passage by the legislature. The developments in Japan could serve as a lesson for Taiwan, where "exposes" are rampant.
The incident began when Democratic Party lawmaker Hisayasu Nagata on Feb. 16 produced a copy of an e-mail accusing a son of LDP Secretary-General Tsutomu of taking ?30 million (US$255,610) in consultancy fees from Takafumi Horie, the former chief executive officer of Livedoor Co, thus implying a close relationship between the LDP and Horie.
The allegation caused a sensation, but when the lawmaker failed to produce unambiguous evidence, he had to offer a public apology. His party's failure to discipline him damaged its image.
Democratic Party Chairman Seiji Maehara and Diet affairs committee chairman Yoshihiko Noda -- who were aware of the situation beforehand -- were also attacked for their failure to supervise and seek the understanding of other party members. As a result, Noda quit his post to shoulder responsibility. Maehara's reputation was badly damaged and he is unlikely to be re-elected. Nagata will be disciplined by the legislature and may even lose his seat.
The e-mail incident highlights the problem of holding politicians accountable. "No proof, no accusation" should be an unalterable principle for all politicians.
Although corruption does exist in Japanese politics, honesty and responsibility are the moral bottom line that politicians must not cross. For example, former foreign minister Makiko Tanaka, once a political superstar, was forced to quit for diverting her assistant's salary for office use. Although she has staged a comeback, her influence is much less significant than before.
If the same thing happened in Taiwan -- where legislators often hire their relatives as legislative assistants to save themselves money -- no punishment would be given. Due to their legislative immunity, lawmakers never think about political accountability when they release "information" without firm evidence.
Nothing can touch them, even if they act as shameless rascals. After all, the president has already taken the lead. What else then, could we expect from our elected representatives?
Albert Yin is an editor at the Japan Research Institute in Taiwan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with